Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
22. Yes, he's our "hero."
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 11:32 AM
Nov 2012

From the report--

With the approval of the Obama administration, an electric car company that received a $529 million federal government loan guarantee is assembling its first line of cars in Finland, saying it could not find a facility in the United States capable of doing the work.

Vice President Joseph Biden heralded the Energy Department's $529 million loan to the start-up electric car company called Fisker as a bright new path to thousands of American manufacturing jobs. But two years after the loan was announced, the company's manufacturing jobs are still limited to the assembly of the flashy electric Fisker Karma sports car in Finland.

"There was no contract manufacturer in the U.S. that could actually produce our vehicle," the car company's founder and namesake told ABC News. "They don't exist here."

Henrik Fisker said the U.S. money has been spent on engineering and design work that stayed in the U.S., not on the 500 manufacturing jobs that went to a rural Finnish firm, Valmet Automotive.

"We're not in the business of failing; we're in the business of winning. So we make the right decision for the business," Fisker said. "That's why we went to Finland."


The sad fact remains that the manufacture of electric cars should have begun in this country a lot sooner than now. Peak oil and global warming was known about at least since the 1950s:

1956:
Hubbert Peak Oil theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubbert_peak_theory

1958:



And, of course, the Bush Family pals and business partners, the Saudis, turned off the oil spigot in the early 1970s, causing uncertainty as well as an increase in oil prices and gas lines.

Even GM toyed with the idea of manufacturing electric cars in the 1990s. The result was a product that Americans wanted. There were lists of anxious consumers would wanted one of Roger Smith's electric cars:

"Who Killed the Electric Car" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0489037/

Unfortunately, he had them all destroyed.

We were warned, repeatedly, what would happen if we remained dependent on oil. We should have known what this all would lead to. Unfortunately, we opted for the gas-guzzling SUV and Hummer.

So if the electric car needs to be made in a foreign country, so be it. We had our chance and we blew it. Why? I don't know. Greed? Someone needs to ask the automobile CEOs. Also ask the fossil fuels CEOs.

Perhaps if Al Gore had taken his rightful place as POTUS, there might be a booming electric-car industry in this country today. But he was denied his chance and the presidency was given to W. Need I say more?

But, as the "news" report indicates, the overall plan included the creation of 1,000s of jobs in America. And an automobile for the future. We'll see.

But I do applaud ABC with its attempt at "hard-hitting investigative journalism."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

nah, they go to washington DC and get worshipped nt msongs Nov 2012 #1
What would that say about our political system? kentuck Nov 2012 #2
Clarification DietCoke Nov 2012 #3
It's a simple question. kentuck Nov 2012 #4
Perhaps we should dig deeper.... DietCoke Nov 2012 #6
You ask? kentuck Nov 2012 #7
Yes I have. DietCoke Nov 2012 #9
Yes. It doesn't work. kentuck Nov 2012 #14
God chosen? DietCoke Nov 2012 #24
ridiculous. on so very many levels. cali Nov 2012 #21
Perhaps its a bridge I built myself..... DietCoke Nov 2012 #25
it is to pay $2 a day for a 14 hour work day, by other human beings that are desperate. we KNOW seabeyond Nov 2012 #15
Ahh yes... 99Forever Nov 2012 #16
Teabags????? DietCoke Nov 2012 #26
Who did you support in the election? Who would you support now? uppityperson Nov 2012 #30
+1000000000 JustAnotherGen Nov 2012 #31
Live and let live..... DietCoke Nov 2012 #35
You supported Gary Johnson, Libertarian from New Mexico. Got it. thanks for clarifying. uppityperson Nov 2012 #39
When you start posting Teabagger memes... 99Forever Nov 2012 #33
Differences..... DietCoke Nov 2012 #41
I think your motives and ... 99Forever Nov 2012 #48
NO IMO we should make moveing jobs overseas unprofitable azurnoir Nov 2012 #5
And the economy? DietCoke Nov 2012 #10
ah so moving jobs overseas is good for the economy I see azurnoir Nov 2012 #12
why yes of course if we don't keep costs low and profits high azurnoir Nov 2012 #13
Job creators DietCoke Nov 2012 #27
No one said..so I will.. AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #28
Thank you DietCoke Nov 2012 #38
Haven't they done serious damage to the U.S. economy? moondust Nov 2012 #8
Not like that. Corporations should lose their corporate charters, no_hypocrisy Nov 2012 #11
Al Gore took us taxpayer money to build cars overseas. Isn't he our "hero"? Romulox Nov 2012 #17
Yes, he's our "hero." KansDem Nov 2012 #22
LOL. EVERY outsourcer claims the work "couldn't be done (CHEAPLY ENOUGH!!!!) in the US" Romulox Nov 2012 #23
I didn't see the term "cheaply enough" in the article. KansDem Nov 2012 #47
The "cheap" part was somewhat implied by the gov't handout they took, no? If their outsourcing model Romulox Nov 2012 #50
A much simpler way. 99Forever Nov 2012 #18
How on earth would that be Constitutional? cali Nov 2012 #19
Billionaires will love that gravity Nov 2012 #20
Nothing in the Constitution provides the government with the power to do that slackmaster Nov 2012 #29
The Constitution.... kentuck Nov 2012 #32
Whaaaaaaaaa" glacierbay Nov 2012 #40
Sorry for the misunderstanding... kentuck Nov 2012 #43
Got it glacierbay Nov 2012 #44
We'd be in deep shit if we had a Congress that started creating ways to deport citizens... slackmaster Nov 2012 #45
The Congress can define whether or not it is "lawful economic activity". kentuck Nov 2012 #46
I really, really think that global corporations should not be allowed to set up shop in the USA Cleita Nov 2012 #34
There's a huge hole in the neo-liberal argument that "free trade" is always "good for everyone". frostfern Nov 2012 #36
Their products should face a GIGANTIC "ENTRY TAX" DonRedwood Nov 2012 #37
No, but congressmen who help them move those jobs should lose theirs! reformist2 Nov 2012 #42
No they shouldn't lose citizenship. HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #49
They wouldn't care treestar Nov 2012 #51
Not as long as the US government and state governments seek to induce multinational corporations... Spider Jerusalem Nov 2012 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should capitalists that m...»Reply #22