Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,655 posts)
29. I have not gotten a clear answer,
Sun Aug 6, 2023, 05:04 PM
Aug 2023

but spend a lot of time in a sarcoma support group urging people to advocate for themselves.

It is a complicated issue. Sarcomas are rare (about 2% of all cancers). Within that 2%, there are between 50 and 100 sub-types, all aggressive, but each with a different risk profile. Sarcomas are good mimics of some benign (much more common) conditions - so the assumption is (especially if you are not at a sarcoma center) that it is the benign thing. Sarcoma often doens't even cross the mind of routine care providers.

The advice is also to never let anyone remove a sarcoma unless they are a sarcoma specialist (it has to be treated differently than other cancers). But there's no clear way to determine if it is a sarcoma without removing it - AND - many/most sarcoma specialists won't see you until you are diagnosed. So if you get someone else to remove it or biopsy it, you are pretty much guaranteed a second surgery - and may have dramatically increased your risk of metastasis by making it harder for the doctor to get the 1 cm margins they need.

The standard criteria for evaluating for a sarcoma is golf-ball sized and growing. But - by the time it is golf-ball sized and growing, it is often too late. Mine was pea-sized when I noticed it. By a month later when I was seen by a nurse practitioner it was kidney-bean sized. Two weeks later when they removed as much as they could get it had grown 50% more. And, when I had the second surgery two weeks after that, it had grown back to kidney-bean or larger size.

Mine was what was called an "oops" surgery (removed by someone who was not a sarcoma specialist). They believed it was benign. I was pretty sure it was cancerous (but wasn't specifically thinking about sarcoma). This regrowth was very different from the previous ones - and there was enough question that my dermatologist agreed to remove it.

I had a dermatofibroma (DF) removed in ~2014. My research indicated that even though DFs are normally benign, there are a handful of characteristics that suggest it might be mimicking a DF and should be treated as pre-cancerous. My DF had all but one of them. So I had several intermediate biopsies of suspicious regrowths, and had been watching it very carefully.

There has to be a better way of finding sarcomas than an alert patient who read enough medical articles to know of the risk, and who badgered her doctors enough to get a biopsy. The people I chat with in the sarcoma support group have tumors between golf-ball sized and watermelon sized - and some in the lower ranges (say up to baseball size) still have to battle their doctors for an evaluation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I did not even have to read the piece to know that she is Black. niyad Aug 2023 #1
Yep. orthoclad Aug 2023 #4
Right? CrispyQ Aug 2023 #10
WTH? I see a slight resemblence in the tip of the nose and that's it. Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #14
You do know those are two photos of the same person, right? Ms. Toad Aug 2023 #16
That's the "buggy wetware" part Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #17
I'm one of those folks who, until 2.5 years ago Ms. Toad Aug 2023 #18
Hope none of those were as bad as the one, above Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #20
Just graduated from 3 month monitoring Ms. Toad Aug 2023 #21
That's good news! Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #25
I have not gotten a clear answer, Ms. Toad Aug 2023 #29
The badly focused photo is her mug shot for driving with an expired license. LisaL Aug 2023 #22
It's not just badly focused Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #23
They are both photos of her. LisaL Aug 2023 #24
I know that Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #27
I had no trouble recognizing both photos being the same person. LisaL Aug 2023 #28
No Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #30
Of course they have to conduct searching for black people cause they all look alike MagickMuffin Aug 2023 #2
"Train" an AI? orthoclad Aug 2023 #6
AI KentuckyWoman Aug 2023 #8
+1 2naSalit Aug 2023 #12
they didnt do any actual investigating after the facial match came up? just ran with it? bullimiami Aug 2023 #3
They had a robbery victim view a photo line up and he picked the same photo. LisaL Aug 2023 #26
Still not good enough. bullimiami Aug 2023 #32
Nobody is saying it's good enough. LisaL Aug 2023 #34
Class action civil rights lawsuit orthoclad Aug 2023 #5
Yep. KentuckyWoman Aug 2023 #7
Yes, laws to stop it, but orthoclad Aug 2023 #9
Exactly. 2naSalit Aug 2023 #13
Law suits against the "system" are paid by the taxpayer. Better to target the tech sector erronis Aug 2023 #15
I think the police departments should be a part of orthoclad Aug 2023 #35
Sounds like the city of Detroit owes someone about $10 million DFW Aug 2023 #11
When are cops going to be held accountable? LiberalFighter Aug 2023 #19
They're designed not to be, so. WhiskeyGrinder Aug 2023 #31
Two things: orthoclad Aug 2023 #36
ACAB nt Arazi Aug 2023 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eight Months Pregnant and...»Reply #29