Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Was Merrick Garland's Approach Correct All Along? [View all]
https://statuskuo.substack.com/p/was-merrick-garlands-approach-correct?utm_source=substack&utm_mediumOk, people, take a deep breath and hear the man out. This article has been so thoughtfully articulated, it is difficult to reduce it and maintain it's clarity and coherence, so please take a few minutes to read it.(my words)
'Im going to say something that might make me a bit unpopular...Attorney General Merrick Garland has taken a logical and reasonable legal path...It comes down to how Garland and the Justice Department...methodically laid a legal pathway for charges against Trump to land, rather than get thrown out of court or held in doubt till the end, where they might be far more vulnerable on appeal...
The first set of defendants...Garland took office in March of 2021, and by May 13...just two months later, the Washington Post reported that 411 suspects had been swept up in what federal officials have called an unprecedented domestic attack on a branch of the U.S. government. Thats a lot of arrests, but notice the wording, which was no accident: The attack was unprecedented, and it was on a branch of the U.S. government.
The Obstruction of an Official Proceeding statute...The statute that 195 defendant rioters had been charged with is 18 U.S.C. 1512(c). That part of the obstruction laws deals with corruptly interfering with an official proceeding... otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, and carries with it a hefty penalty of up to 20 years in prison...What does corruptly mean here?...What does otherwise include here?...The Justice Department didnt have a clear answer to any of these questions from the courts back in 2021. So proceeding early with this statute against someone like Trump would have been a very dicey proposition had prosecutors not first laid a solid legal foundation....And thats exactly what the Justice Department has been doing over the past two years, appearing before multiple district courts in the D.C. Circuit and before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals....And its work is very nearly done.'
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Also, under TFG (and AG Jeff Sessions) numerous divisions of DOJ were ignored (Civil Rights)
Rhiannon12866
Aug 2023
#48
I've given little to no thought of Garland especially since Jack Smith came on the scene. Garland is
SheilaAnn
Aug 2023
#2
Obama thought Garland would be conservative enough that Repugs wouldn't block him.
BWdem4life
Aug 2023
#112
I know everyone wished this would happen sooner, but in reality, it couldn't ...
ificandream
Aug 2023
#5
I believe Cannon will be steamrolled by the upper courts if she presents as a bubble in the asphalt.
erronis
Aug 2023
#9
No. How long did it take for Garland to name Smith? And how long did it take
dem4decades
Aug 2023
#10
So, if Trump didn't announce Garland would have done nothing? Two days after Trump declared
dem4decades
Aug 2023
#75
I'm pretty sure Biden didn't want anything to happen until after the Midterms
FakeNoose
Aug 2023
#52
I don't understand where all this hostility towards Garland is coming from
Beastly Boy
Aug 2023
#101
Refusing to accept being wrong. Part of black or white, good or bad, us vs them thinking.
betsuni
Aug 2023
#135
By your own admission, the extent of your observations leaves much to be desired.
Beastly Boy
Aug 2023
#51
I don't get you, but that's OK. I don't usually express my firm absolute 100% beliefs out of boredom
Beastly Boy
Aug 2023
#86
Memories ... once upon a time, Trump and Republicans liked Merrick Garland.
ificandream
Aug 2023
#23
Of course it was. There is just a loud contingent of whiners who live solely to whine.
tritsofme
Aug 2023
#27
There is a loud contingent who is incapable of disagreeing without name-calling
Scrivener7
Aug 2023
#47
My question was what role does Garland play in Trump winning or losing the '24 election
Beastly Boy
Aug 2023
#72
No it has not been delayed.DOJ didn't fail to investigate Trump. It's a fairy tale debunked long ago
Beastly Boy
Aug 2023
#79
I've never had a real problem with Garland. His careful approach was needed.
LymphocyteLover
Aug 2023
#36
You bet it was. He had a DoJ packed with TFG plants, and he got the investigations going.
marble falls
Aug 2023
#37
Are you under the impression that due process of law is no reason for not jumping the gun?
Beastly Boy
Aug 2023
#106
Jacob Chancley (the QAnon Shaman) was arrested on 1/9/21. Indicted on 1/11/21.
Beastly Boy
Aug 2023
#109
We can't rewrite history. We can't know everything that was happening behind the scenes.
Mr. Ected
Aug 2023
#107