Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
34. I really, really think that global corporations should not be allowed to set up shop in the USA
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 03:00 PM
Nov 2012

even though maybe they had their roots in America like AT & T. Those companies that are incorporating in tax haven places and putting their money in banks overseas should be declared non-USA based companies. That really is what's happening. Not only does it take away jobs but tax revenues cause it's easy for them to hide profits if they are incorporated in other countries. We could do a lot by insisting that our corporations be solely incorporated in one of the American states. We could do business with foreign companies by treaty but they shouldn't be allowed in here mining our national resources like BP and their footprint on our landscape should be minimal. I don't give a crap that Toyota has plants in America. We should be producing American cars in those plants instead and selling them overseas as well as here.

If we had a law stating that stores like Wal-Mart had to keep 60% of their stock with goods made in America, and if we put tariffs on cheap imports bring the retail price to what American made goods would cost, we could accomplish this. It was what we did after WWII and it worked. We could do it again. Our incorporation laws were very protective of our American industries then but also restrictive to keep them in line.

Laissez faire economic policies were one of the main reasons behind the French Revolution and will cause one here in the future if we don't wake up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

nah, they go to washington DC and get worshipped nt msongs Nov 2012 #1
What would that say about our political system? kentuck Nov 2012 #2
Clarification DietCoke Nov 2012 #3
It's a simple question. kentuck Nov 2012 #4
Perhaps we should dig deeper.... DietCoke Nov 2012 #6
You ask? kentuck Nov 2012 #7
Yes I have. DietCoke Nov 2012 #9
Yes. It doesn't work. kentuck Nov 2012 #14
God chosen? DietCoke Nov 2012 #24
ridiculous. on so very many levels. cali Nov 2012 #21
Perhaps its a bridge I built myself..... DietCoke Nov 2012 #25
it is to pay $2 a day for a 14 hour work day, by other human beings that are desperate. we KNOW seabeyond Nov 2012 #15
Ahh yes... 99Forever Nov 2012 #16
Teabags????? DietCoke Nov 2012 #26
Who did you support in the election? Who would you support now? uppityperson Nov 2012 #30
+1000000000 JustAnotherGen Nov 2012 #31
Live and let live..... DietCoke Nov 2012 #35
You supported Gary Johnson, Libertarian from New Mexico. Got it. thanks for clarifying. uppityperson Nov 2012 #39
When you start posting Teabagger memes... 99Forever Nov 2012 #33
Differences..... DietCoke Nov 2012 #41
I think your motives and ... 99Forever Nov 2012 #48
NO IMO we should make moveing jobs overseas unprofitable azurnoir Nov 2012 #5
And the economy? DietCoke Nov 2012 #10
ah so moving jobs overseas is good for the economy I see azurnoir Nov 2012 #12
why yes of course if we don't keep costs low and profits high azurnoir Nov 2012 #13
Job creators DietCoke Nov 2012 #27
No one said..so I will.. AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #28
Thank you DietCoke Nov 2012 #38
Haven't they done serious damage to the U.S. economy? moondust Nov 2012 #8
Not like that. Corporations should lose their corporate charters, no_hypocrisy Nov 2012 #11
Al Gore took us taxpayer money to build cars overseas. Isn't he our "hero"? Romulox Nov 2012 #17
Yes, he's our "hero." KansDem Nov 2012 #22
LOL. EVERY outsourcer claims the work "couldn't be done (CHEAPLY ENOUGH!!!!) in the US" Romulox Nov 2012 #23
I didn't see the term "cheaply enough" in the article. KansDem Nov 2012 #47
The "cheap" part was somewhat implied by the gov't handout they took, no? If their outsourcing model Romulox Nov 2012 #50
A much simpler way. 99Forever Nov 2012 #18
How on earth would that be Constitutional? cali Nov 2012 #19
Billionaires will love that gravity Nov 2012 #20
Nothing in the Constitution provides the government with the power to do that slackmaster Nov 2012 #29
The Constitution.... kentuck Nov 2012 #32
Whaaaaaaaaa" glacierbay Nov 2012 #40
Sorry for the misunderstanding... kentuck Nov 2012 #43
Got it glacierbay Nov 2012 #44
We'd be in deep shit if we had a Congress that started creating ways to deport citizens... slackmaster Nov 2012 #45
The Congress can define whether or not it is "lawful economic activity". kentuck Nov 2012 #46
I really, really think that global corporations should not be allowed to set up shop in the USA Cleita Nov 2012 #34
There's a huge hole in the neo-liberal argument that "free trade" is always "good for everyone". frostfern Nov 2012 #36
Their products should face a GIGANTIC "ENTRY TAX" DonRedwood Nov 2012 #37
No, but congressmen who help them move those jobs should lose theirs! reformist2 Nov 2012 #42
No they shouldn't lose citizenship. HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #49
They wouldn't care treestar Nov 2012 #51
Not as long as the US government and state governments seek to induce multinational corporations... Spider Jerusalem Nov 2012 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should capitalists that m...»Reply #34