Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(114,050 posts)
15. No. It is the state of Colorado's "take" on risk of child abuse. Just as I must report abnormal
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 01:53 PM
Aug 2023

behavior by the "parents" that might signal they are NOT the parents but instead "traffickers" OR the unexplained bruising or semi-healed past fractures that I identify. Zero tolerance for signs or signalment of potential abuse. We have to report such potential for further investigation.

You have to live with your viewpoints and defense of same-- including potential markers for child sexual assault. I don't have to accept them. And legally, if I see them, I cannot ignore them. That includes reporting an employee for review who I observe possesses them. And, I can guarantee there would be very little tolerance.

So, make it an academic argument if you like. But, I'd suggest you recognize how little that will gain you in the "real world" where many (teachers, HCWs, others with direct child interaction) are rightfully protective and legally obligated to report the signs and signalment of potential abuse. Frankly, I'd report such material if it showed bestiality as well. But, then Colorado likewise takes animal abuse seriously. YMMV.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is not what Dennis Prager said. NT mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2023 #1
Okay. What DID he say, then? hlthe2b Aug 2023 #4
He's talking about animated or cartoon images. Real kids do not appear in those. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2023 #5
OMG. You too? hlthe2b Aug 2023 #6
I'm just telling you what he said, which is not accurately reflected in the thread's title. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2023 #8
I guess it depends on you definition of "child porn" 617Blue Aug 2023 #9
the 'discussion', if you care to look back stopdiggin Aug 2023 #13
The portrayal of children in porn IS wrong edisdead Aug 2023 #18
Clearly both imagining it and doing it are ... Whiskeytide Aug 2023 #19
that particular sentence (excerpted from the larger discussion) stopdiggin Aug 2023 #11
I am well aware of what it says and the distinction some are trying to make. Despicable, IMO hlthe2b Aug 2023 #12
that is your take stopdiggin Aug 2023 #14
No. It is the state of Colorado's "take" on risk of child abuse. Just as I must report abnormal hlthe2b Aug 2023 #15
Same. It sends a message that sexualizing children for cartoon porn is OK. ananda Aug 2023 #24
What.... The.... Fuck???? edisdead Aug 2023 #16
Wrong. It is cut and dry...it despicable. Demsrule86 Aug 2023 #25
He's one of a number of well-funded RW propagandists. maxsolomon Aug 2023 #2
OMG... hlthe2b Aug 2023 #3
I remember when Prager was on local talk radio, pushing his morality brand. calimary Aug 2023 #7
I think there is a line between "creepy" and illegal. TheRealNorth Aug 2023 #10
One of the things that always springs to mind for me on this topic Sympthsical Aug 2023 #17
First of all masturbating to cartoon images of children is evil behavior...you still are finding Demsrule86 Aug 2023 #26
Hi, I'm Dennis Prager. I jerk off to hentai. jmowreader Aug 2023 #20
Prager loves porn..for males Demovictory9 Aug 2023 #21
Regardless of what should or shouldn't be legal dsc Aug 2023 #22
You mean hard-wiring your brain to associate orgasmic pleasure with extreme cruelty to children? Hekate Aug 2023 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dennis Prager: What's Wro...»Reply #15