Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
73. Ridiculous way to state the issue
Fri Aug 11, 2023, 05:41 PM
Aug 2023

I'm not qualified to skate in the Olympics, but that doesn't mean I can't recognize when someone slips and wipes out on the ice.

Whether Garland's handling of Trump and 1/6 is the moral equivalent of wiping out on the ice is an entirely different matter from the bogus premise of your challenge, i.e. that you must be capable of doing someone's job in order to have a valid complaint about how that person does their job.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

👍 Joinfortmill Aug 2023 #1
Not me Aviation Pro Aug 2023 #2
And who can use logical fallacies better than the OP? Nt Gore1FL Aug 2023 #3
... William769 Aug 2023 #5
Got anything besides emojis? Doc Sportello Aug 2023 #42
They do get the point across though. William769 Aug 2023 #58
Rarely to never. Mr.Bill Aug 2023 #63
+1. Beat me to it. Appeal to authority ones I especially dislike. Celerity Aug 2023 #17
not a logical fallacy. by whiningabout Garlands actions you are making the argument Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #66
I am not sure how "you" refers to in your statement. Gore1FL Aug 2023 #74
This rhetoric isn't helpful. Marius25 Aug 2023 #4
You're right this rhetoric isn't helpful William769 Aug 2023 #7
Yep. Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #16
I gotta say, MarineCombatEngineer Aug 2023 #56
thank you Skittles Aug 2023 #21
Thank you. lamp_shade Aug 2023 #6
Point well taken. In fact, I was thinking about this earlier. LuckyCharms Aug 2023 #8
... William769 Aug 2023 #10
Bingo. LakeArenal Aug 2023 #30
True. That's very significant. LuckyCharms Aug 2023 #35
People on the Internet don't count as American citizens, or People for that matter. msfiddlestix Aug 2023 #44
Gee, sorry you feel that way. LuckyCharms Aug 2023 #53
Good to know you don't count and aren't an American citizen AZSkiffyGeek Aug 2023 #62
I am in reality very much a U.S. Citizen and a real person. msfiddlestix Aug 2023 #75
It should have been Sally Yates Ritabert Aug 2023 #9
✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ n/t msfiddlestix Aug 2023 #45
Or Doug Jones Sneederbunk Aug 2023 #67
Kick for reality mcar Aug 2023 #11
One need not be a professional chef w/ Michelin-starred restaurants to know when RockRaven Aug 2023 #12
agree republianmushroom Aug 2023 #14
I stand by the OP William769 Aug 2023 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity Aug 2023 #32
Everything inthewind21 Aug 2023 #23
You clearly missed the point by demanding my qualifications/clearance. RockRaven Aug 2023 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author inthewind21 Aug 2023 #33
Right you are! comradebillyboy Aug 2023 #39
I would do a better job that's for sure. Marius25 Aug 2023 #13
Heres the phone number to the White House (202) 456-1111 William769 Aug 2023 #20
Subject line edited to avoid a TOS violation Orrex Aug 2023 #40
Talk about calling out. LakeArenal Aug 2023 #50
Post removed Post removed Aug 2023 #52
As are you. Predictably so. LakeArenal Aug 2023 #55
Irrelevant to the point at hand Orrex Aug 2023 #60
Thank gawd. LakeArenal Aug 2023 #68
Such a bogus argument, Numerous high profile law experts have complained about dem4decades Aug 2023 #18
I'll belittle the petty. William769 Aug 2023 #22
Post removed Post removed Aug 2023 #37
Doesn't need one inthewind21 Aug 2023 #46
✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ n/t msfiddlestix Aug 2023 #47
He's doing a fine job. underpants Aug 2023 #19
Mahalo, William.. It helped me.. Cha Aug 2023 #24
I miss our late night chats. William769 Aug 2023 #27
So glad you're back.. we'll Cha Aug 2023 #38
Personally, I'd rather be better than Clarence Thomas on SCOTUS. Frasier Balzov Aug 2023 #25
... William769 Aug 2023 #28
I've had an ass for a lawyer and a fool for a client, many, many times. stuck in the middle Aug 2023 #29
His actions as AG so far have convinced me of one thing for sure Cheezoholic Aug 2023 #31
Great point. William769 Aug 2023 #34
Who here thinks that the OP is flame bait? Orrex Aug 2023 #36
Really? And the threads calling Garland a weak ass do-nothing is not bait to those who support him? LakeArenal Aug 2023 #41
The OP is calling out DUers Orrex Aug 2023 #49
It's the internet; we're all baiters. Bucky Aug 2023 #71
Not saying they should. Already said a discussion board is for discussing. LakeArenal Aug 2023 #72
Well inthewind21 Aug 2023 #48
Oh please Orrex Aug 2023 #51
If you think I am calling out DUER'S, you are free to alert. William769 Aug 2023 #54
Post removed Post removed Aug 2023 #57
Me. msfiddlestix Aug 2023 #43
Mitch McConnell is much more qualified edhopper Aug 2023 #59
Thank you. we can do it Aug 2023 #61
oh!!! I can! I stayed in a Holiday Inn 2 nights this week Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #64
Don't need qualifications to have and express opinions Chautauquas Aug 2023 #65
Yep I saw that on both sides and I a man enough to admit guilty as charged. William769 Aug 2023 #69
"If you're not qualified for the office, you're not allowed to criticize the office holder" Bucky Aug 2023 #70
Ridiculous way to state the issue Silent3 Aug 2023 #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who here thinks they are ...»Reply #73