Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Petreaus Allowed Right Wing Think Tanks to Set Up Shop at his Afghan Headquarters [View all]deurbano
(3,001 posts)95. Some think tanks linked with Patraeus....
http://ipsnorthamerica.net/news.php?idnews=3133
Surge of Think Tanks Blurs U.S. Policy Lines Part 1
by Michael Flynn (director of IPS Right Web and the lead researcher of the Global Detention Project at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva
During his acceptance speech, titled "The Surge of Ideas", Petraeus lauded a number of neoconservative "scholars" associated with AEI, in particular "Team Kagan", for their work in preparing the intellectual ground work that led to the "surge" in Iraq .
Three months earlier, in January, Petraeus offered a very similar speech about the "surge of ideas" during a talked organised by Kim Kagan's Institute for the Study of War (ISW) During his ISW presentation, which was devoted largely to discussing U.S. military priorities in the greater Middle East, Petraeus argued that "far more important than the surge of 30,000 additional U.S. troops was the surge of ideas that helped us to employ those troops." He said that a number of think tank "heroes" like "Fred" and "Kim" were responsible for developing a "study and analysis that did indeed have a strategic impact unlike that of any other study or analysis that I can think of" . claiming that their work "serendipitously" made its way into "the West Wing and ultimately even into the Oval Office
Petraeus's "surge of ideas" speech highlights an issue that has drawn increasing attention and criticism from commentators and foreign policy experts. In recent years, there has been a tendency for like-minded think tanks and military officers to jointly pursue policy objectives, sometimes in opposition to the stated preferences of the administration .
Katulis points to Petraeus's support for the work of Michael O'Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack of the centrist Brookings Institution. In a July 2007 article for the New York Times titled "A War We Might Just Win" - a "propaganda piece", says Katulis - the two analysts cited their military- sponsored tour in Iraq to claim that, as a result of the surge, "morale was high", the bad guys were on the run, and while the situation remained "grave", the military escalation merited continued congressional support .
This "Petreaus Model" was updated late last year by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, head of U.S. forces in Afghanistan .. Team members included the omnipresent Kagans, Stephen Biddle of the Council on Foreign Relations, Anthony Cordesman of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Andrew Exum of the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS), and Jeremy Shapiro of the Brookings Institution .
Surge of Think Tanks Blurs U.S. Policy Lines Part 1
by Michael Flynn (director of IPS Right Web and the lead researcher of the Global Detention Project at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva
During his acceptance speech, titled "The Surge of Ideas", Petraeus lauded a number of neoconservative "scholars" associated with AEI, in particular "Team Kagan", for their work in preparing the intellectual ground work that led to the "surge" in Iraq .
Three months earlier, in January, Petraeus offered a very similar speech about the "surge of ideas" during a talked organised by Kim Kagan's Institute for the Study of War (ISW) During his ISW presentation, which was devoted largely to discussing U.S. military priorities in the greater Middle East, Petraeus argued that "far more important than the surge of 30,000 additional U.S. troops was the surge of ideas that helped us to employ those troops." He said that a number of think tank "heroes" like "Fred" and "Kim" were responsible for developing a "study and analysis that did indeed have a strategic impact unlike that of any other study or analysis that I can think of" . claiming that their work "serendipitously" made its way into "the West Wing and ultimately even into the Oval Office
Petraeus's "surge of ideas" speech highlights an issue that has drawn increasing attention and criticism from commentators and foreign policy experts. In recent years, there has been a tendency for like-minded think tanks and military officers to jointly pursue policy objectives, sometimes in opposition to the stated preferences of the administration .
Katulis points to Petraeus's support for the work of Michael O'Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack of the centrist Brookings Institution. In a July 2007 article for the New York Times titled "A War We Might Just Win" - a "propaganda piece", says Katulis - the two analysts cited their military- sponsored tour in Iraq to claim that, as a result of the surge, "morale was high", the bad guys were on the run, and while the situation remained "grave", the military escalation merited continued congressional support .
This "Petreaus Model" was updated late last year by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, head of U.S. forces in Afghanistan .. Team members included the omnipresent Kagans, Stephen Biddle of the Council on Foreign Relations, Anthony Cordesman of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Andrew Exum of the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS), and Jeremy Shapiro of the Brookings Institution .
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Petreaus Allowed Right Wing Think Tanks to Set Up Shop at his Afghan Headquarters [View all]
kpete
Nov 2012
OP
Petreaus sounds more dangerous every time I learn something new about him
Anthony McCarthy
Nov 2012
#3
Obama may have placed him there knowing fully that the CIA know how to take care of things.
LiberalArkie
Nov 2012
#64
Where do you think Mr. Karl Rove fits in? He was a player in this for sure. I think this
crunch60
Nov 2012
#26
Good bye little man with too much power. I never trusted or liked you anyway! nt
Walk away
Nov 2012
#5
Obama should stop appointing republicans to his administration. its not worth it..
vilify
Nov 2012
#6
Stop channeling Martin Luther King, Jr. and start channeling Malcom X - n/t
coalition_unwilling
Nov 2012
#82
You Meant to Say: "Think Tanks," Which Are Ideological Groups Trying to Fabricate Justifications...
mckara
Nov 2012
#17
why not? many think Afghanistan is a "project for the new american century" undertaking anway
amborin
Nov 2012
#40
Makes sense since the main reason for the war was looting the treasury. Suits on the ground
brewens
Nov 2012
#51
But of course this General had fired thousands of people for being gay in his career.
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2012
#66
How dangerous is a war in which the Generals are having a party and doing deals?
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2012
#67