Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is it that employers must provide/subsidize healthcare? [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)27. Right, wasn't it a way to get around a wage ceiling?
And then it became almost like canon law. We need to get away from it. If people had to cover themselves with their earnings - say they were paid the amount the insurance cost by being the conduit for it - they would be much more likely to support single payer.
It's like the way the IRS takes taxes out during the year. Wise, but people don't "feel" the taxes this way. They rant on about being tax payers. But if they had to write the check themselves each year rather than having their employer pay it and then get back the excess, well they'd be a lot less likely to support the wars, etc. They'd know now much they were paying and feel it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why is it that employers must provide/subsidize healthcare? [View all]
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2012
OP
This is where he probably would disagree - since he would say that taking healthcare out of the
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2012
#10
I agree - but then you would have to convince them that the cost of increased taxes would not
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2012
#16
It's an historic consequence of healthcare being an inticement to employment
HereSince1628
Nov 2012
#6
exactly...."Doing the right thing." That is also was is also what is missing completely from
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2012
#20
Yes I believe it was, then it became a "business as usual" alternative to monetary compensation
HereSince1628
Nov 2012
#34
yes. And also, a long time ago, you simply paid your "doctor visit" bills - maybe even had a
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2012
#21
He is correct and they should not have to. Plus, why attach healthcare cost to American products??
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#15
Therein lies the rub - we all know WHAT needs to happen to cure this problem.
HughBeaumont
Nov 2012
#18
Why not compromise. Why not de-couple routine healthcare from hospitalization? That's
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2012
#23
It was once part of a benefits package to get and keep good workers. It also sometimes included
juajen
Nov 2012
#22
The answer is simply-- Who else? Every national system I'm aware of...
TreasonousBastard
Nov 2012
#25
This will soon, very soon, become the standard view for most businesses
riderinthestorm
Nov 2012
#30
Your friend needs to study the history of post WWII American economics to find the answer.
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#33