Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,307 posts)
69. See post #'s 30 and 44.
Thu Sep 14, 2023, 09:12 PM
Sep 2023

My posts -- and those of a whole lot of other DU'ers -- have been literal enough in support of Garland over the last year.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Garland claudette Sep 2023 #1
Better than Janet Reno? Polybius Sep 2023 #85
GARLAND IS GREAT! dem4decades Sep 2023 #2
Why is he great? Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #5
Because he is. nt MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #11
LOL. Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #14
Becaust that's all it deserves. nt MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #18
I don't know what is more obnoxious AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #20
100+. nt MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #23
Oh Noooos! Not Manny! sheshe2 Sep 2023 #62
yeah. it is going to be VERY interesting this next year on DU Recycle_Guru Sep 2023 #87
It's always very interesting on DU. This crowd can entertain and enlighten even without housecat Sep 2023 #97
+1 ancianita Sep 2023 #33
Seriously? Because he isn't.. mountain grammy Sep 2023 #25
Seriously? Because he is. MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #31
No he isn't. Garland is Badass. ancianita Sep 2023 #37
that sounds intriguing ("This isn't happening the way you think it's happening.") orleans Sep 2023 #67
See post #'s 30 and 44. ancianita Sep 2023 #69
i was just going to edit and let you know not to bother b/c i finished reading downthread orleans Sep 2023 #77
A Jedi mind trick? MusicLikeDirt Sep 2023 #92
He brought in Jack Smith housecat Sep 2023 #29
Yeah, almost TWO YEARS after Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #66
Imagine if Smith wasn't here. housecat Sep 2023 #94
That would absolutely suck. Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #95
So forget the two years and enjoy the show housecat Sep 2023 #96
How so? nt ramen Sep 2023 #51
Because he is. nt MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #53
Oh. nt ramen Sep 2023 #74
Maybe a festoon. JanMichael Sep 2023 #133
...why did republicans scream like stuck pigs when special counsel was appointed? Contradiction. Alexander Of Assyria Sep 2023 #3
It only takes one doubter to bring all the Garland bashers out. LOL ancianita Sep 2023 #42
I Said Garland Was Incompetent From OhioTim Sep 2023 #75
And you were wrong from day 1, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #84
How soon the bashers forget some remember very clearly... sad for them. Again! Alexander Of Assyria Sep 2023 #93
yay! You are the 100th post on the subject--tell him what he's won! Recycle_Guru Sep 2023 #4
They aren't going to do much to Hunter. This is a common crime, just not caught much or ... marble falls Sep 2023 #6
agree republianmushroom Sep 2023 #27
And another thread bashing the best AG we've had in a long time. MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #7
How is he the best AG we've had in a long time? Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #9
#1. MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #10
He went after the little guys, the low-hanging fruit, the chumps that did the dirty work. Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #15
Welp, if that's what you want to believe, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #19
.. Cha Sep 2023 #43
This is the traditional Fed method of prosecutions. Start with the low hanging fruit and then ... marble falls Sep 2023 #34
Nailed it 100%. nt MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #41
Doesn't take much, does it. FUD is the trigger when folks here believe media HYPE. ancianita Sep 2023 #39
So true. MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #40
It's an unconstitional law meant to limit Second Amendment rights. nt LexVegas Sep 2023 #8
1) you forgot to add the 'sarcasm' thingee stopdiggin Sep 2023 #12
Similar convictions have already been overturned as unconstitutional. LexVegas Sep 2023 #13
doubt that stopdiggin Sep 2023 #16
Unlawful user of, and addicted to, any stimulant, narcotic drug, and any other controlled substance Shermann Sep 2023 #17
That provision is currently undergoing... Happy Hoosier Sep 2023 #88
It's really a hot mess Shermann Sep 2023 #89
Federal law sets the definitions Zeitghost Sep 2023 #103
OK so the term "addict" is defined as... Shermann Sep 2023 #111
What if... Zeitghost Sep 2023 #112
Unlawful user of AND addicted to Shermann Sep 2023 #113
Hunter admits he's an addict madville Sep 2023 #117
You do know the form 4473 is a quick search away on the internet yes? Zeitghost Sep 2023 #119
I stand corrected Shermann Sep 2023 #122
They are not very subjective Zeitghost Sep 2023 #127
"Endangering the public morals" isn't subjective? Shermann Sep 2023 #129
You do understand Zeitghost Sep 2023 #135
As others have pointed out, lower courts have already ruled it unconstitutional Shermann Sep 2023 #136
One court has rejected it on 2nd amendment grounds Zeitghost Sep 2023 #137
The problem is the good wording is mixed with the weasel wording Shermann Sep 2023 #138
Joe Biden should pardon his son just to piss off Trump! Emile Sep 2023 #21
I Love that! edhopper Sep 2023 #22
Best thing he could do.. and I agree! mountain grammy Sep 2023 #26
Just an all around bad idea. Funny to joke about, but not something to seriously consider. marble falls Sep 2023 #35
+ 1 nt pazzyanne Sep 2023 #76
👆 Rebl2 Sep 2023 #50
IDK about that but the WH does need to start pushing back against this. Ligyron Sep 2023 #79
That might be one of the easiest ways Zeitghost Sep 2023 #107
Sorry, but you're not allowed to criticize Garland here apparently. Marius25 Sep 2023 #24
You nailed it. republianmushroom Sep 2023 #32
Sure you are, otherwise your posts or threads would be hidden, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Marius25 Sep 2023 #46
Sorry you're Wrong.. there's tons of Cha Sep 2023 #45
Post removed Post removed Sep 2023 #47
Sure is! ShazzieB Sep 2023 #114
Yep he did! This is a real and dangerous political prosecution.. mountain grammy Sep 2023 #28
.... MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #38
Garland did NOT bow to GOP pressure. Y'all are confused AF. ancianita Sep 2023 #30
no he didn't bigtree Sep 2023 #44
Exactly. Thank you. ancianita Sep 2023 #57
+1 chowder66 Sep 2023 #58
👍 Joinfortmill Sep 2023 #132
This message was self-deleted by its author MyNameIsJonas Sep 2023 #48
I disagree with your premise about AG Garland, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #49
To be fair, Hunter is incredibly guilty of these crimes Johonny Sep 2023 #52
The plea deal edhopper Sep 2023 #54
It seems weird to not be able to reach a plea deal Johonny Sep 2023 #78
Weiss is. Trump appointee edhopper Sep 2023 #80
Please read ancianita's posts nos. 30 and 44. ShazzieB Sep 2023 #115
Hunter's lawyer said no deal unless all future charges disappear womanofthehills Sep 2023 #130
It's not that simple edhopper Sep 2023 #131
Not this bullshit again. emulatorloo Sep 2023 #55
So sorry Edhopper your post devolved immediately.... Just so you know, I agree with you. msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #56
I expected the push back edhopper Sep 2023 #61
I have never understood the Sainthood status given to him msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #64
Please read ancianita's posts nos. 30 and 44. ShazzieB Sep 2023 #116
... William769 Sep 2023 #59
This is a nothingburger. I'm more concerned about the SC hasn't cleared Joe Raven123 Sep 2023 #60
Why is there even an SC for that edhopper Sep 2023 #63
Fair question, but still not as important as the SC not clearing Joe already Raven123 Sep 2023 #90
+1 uponit7771 Sep 2023 #99
Sorry, but let's not take ourselves too seriously. And that Hortensis Sep 2023 #65
Not my opinion edhopper Sep 2023 #68
No. Btw, I don't believe you should regard anyone Hortensis Sep 2023 #73
I'd let President Biden know. Perhaps he's not as perceptive as you are... brooklynite Sep 2023 #70
Know what edhopper Sep 2023 #71
he now thinks he should have interfered in the investigation into his son bigtree Sep 2023 #83
Not what I said edhopper Sep 2023 #86
The in-fighting here is a bit alarming. We can disagree respectfully. Just saying.... Evolve Dammit Sep 2023 #72
Where was I disrespectful edhopper Sep 2023 #81
👍 Joinfortmill Sep 2023 #134
Biden will get his day in front of an impartial jury just like everyone else Takket Sep 2023 #82
Hunter IS guilty. He already pled guilty to these common tax and gun charges once. Alexander Of Assyria Sep 2023 #98
This message was self-deleted by its author elocs Sep 2023 #91
I agree with you. SYFROYH Sep 2023 #102
100% agree SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2023 #108
100+. nt MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #110
Garland did the right thing. gulliver Sep 2023 #100
The right thing would be edhopper Sep 2023 #101
When was there a failed prosecution? Zeitghost Sep 2023 #104
When his plea bargain deal fell apart. edhopper Sep 2023 #105
That's not a failed prosecution Zeitghost Sep 2023 #106
Hey man, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #109
So inthewind21 Sep 2023 #121
Not sure how you came to that conclusion? edhopper Sep 2023 #123
Hunter shouldn't have to go to jail for something people rarely even get prosecuted for. ShazzieB Sep 2023 #118
Hunter should go to jail Zeitghost Sep 2023 #124
Yes, In general, people who are convicted of crimes should be held accountable. ShazzieB Sep 2023 #125
Hunter backed out of the plea Zeitghost Sep 2023 #126
Whatever. ShazzieB Sep 2023 #128
If the orange one takes power, Garland will be one of the first political enemy's arrested. Hotler Sep 2023 #120
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Garland blew it with Hunt...»Reply #69