Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Now That DOJ Is Running Fact Checks On Gun Applications [View all]Autumn
(48,973 posts)56. I don't need to be proven right, you seem to have a need to prove people wrong.
In truth you seem to have a vested interest in doing so. And once again you try to run with something I never said.
Yes I do think Garland was wrong to appoint Weiss. And that's the only thing will find me saying about Garland. He was wrong to appoint the man who has hounded Hunter for the last several years , he kept after Garland until he gave in and gave Weiss the job he wanted.
Beastly Boy (6,793 posts)
32. People who think Garland was wrong to appoint Weiss tend to be
the people who think Garland was wrong in every little thing he did as an AG. And more often than not they themselves are proven to be wrong. This never deters them from their mission.
The consistency of what they think is conspicuous to say the least. Each time they think Garland was wrong on any subject only reinforces the notion that the subject has no role in informing their opinions.
32. People who think Garland was wrong to appoint Weiss tend to be
the people who think Garland was wrong in every little thing he did as an AG. And more often than not they themselves are proven to be wrong. This never deters them from their mission.
The consistency of what they think is conspicuous to say the least. Each time they think Garland was wrong on any subject only reinforces the notion that the subject has no role in informing their opinions.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm pretty sure they will find tons of false information on gun applications....................
Lovie777
Sep 2023
#1
To me, it seems like stretching an analogy to ridiculous extent in order to create yet another
Beastly Boy
Sep 2023
#29
So what are you following? Posters who think Garland was wrong to appoint a partisan hack like Weiss
Autumn
Sep 2023
#15
There is no need to stretch the discussion. It only shows what I pointed out the first time around.
Beastly Boy
Sep 2023
#63
Deservedly so, a politically driven SC for a gun charge is disgusting on its face ... period end of
uponit7771
Sep 2023
#21