Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Autumn

(48,962 posts)
61. Now you are stretching the discussion.
Sun Sep 17, 2023, 12:27 PM
Sep 2023
I have no interest in playing your game. Garland was wrong to appoint Weiss. I stand by that and I will await you proving me wrong.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm pretty sure they will find tons of false information on gun applications.................... Lovie777 Sep 2023 #1
Will they be indicted for 3 felonies? gab13by13 Sep 2023 #2
That would depend on the circumstances of each inquiry, now wouldn't it? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #27
So Hunter's case was more serious than Patrick Daniel's? gab13by13 Sep 2023 #35
That is up to the jury to decide, not me or you. And not Garland or Weiss. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #48
A vulnerability of theirs that we should use to the hilt. wnylib Sep 2023 #5
+1 2naSalit Sep 2023 #20
A MOST interesting suggestion! calimary Sep 2023 #49
The idea was inspired by what I learned about the Salem witch trials. wnylib Sep 2023 #77
Hah! "Spectral evidence". calimary Sep 2023 #86
Have you ever seen the play or movie, The Crucible? wnylib Sep 2023 #88
I would love to see this. qwlauren35 Sep 2023 #58
Is this another bash DoJ/AG Garland thread? MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #3
It doesn't seem that way to me radical noodle Sep 2023 #9
Fair enough, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #10
It's a great comeback when talking to MAGAts radical noodle Sep 2023 #12
EXCELLENT!!! calimary Sep 2023 #51
It works almost as well radical noodle Sep 2023 #83
Perfect! MorbidButterflyTat Sep 2023 #65
And she seems to own more than one firearm. sl8 Sep 2023 #14
To me, it seems like stretching an analogy to ridiculous extent in order to create yet another Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #29
Do you think that Hunter Biden was treated fairly by DOJ? gab13by13 Sep 2023 #11
I have no idea if he was treated fairly by the Garland's DoJ, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #13
So what are you following? Posters who think Garland was wrong to appoint a partisan hack like Weiss Autumn Sep 2023 #15
We can wait until the cows come home gab13by13 Sep 2023 #17
People who think Garland was wrong to appoint Weiss tend to be Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #32
100+. MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #36
"every little thing he did as an AG" Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #37
That is implied in my post. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #50
careful, Sky Jewels Skittles Sep 2023 #79
You're right. Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #81
he is definitely "central" Skittles Sep 2023 #82
Yes, the palatable pick that would have appeased the right, Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #84
Is this post a defense of Garland? gab13by13 Sep 2023 #39
All of a sudden? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #52
Quit reading what I didn't say. I eagerly await you proving me wrong Autumn Sep 2023 #40
What is there in your post to be proven you are wrong? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #54
I don't need to be proven right, you seem to have a need to prove people wrong. Autumn Sep 2023 #56
Then, should I take it that you need to be proven wrong? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #60
Now you are stretching the discussion. Autumn Sep 2023 #61
There is no need to stretch the discussion. It only shows what I pointed out the first time around. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #63
You said I and others would be proved wrong. We won't be. Autumn Sep 2023 #64
I didn't say you WOULD be proven wrong. I said you WERE proven wrong. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #69
I must have slept though it and missed being proven wrong. Autumn Sep 2023 #74
I directed you to your own past posts and responses to them. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #76
+1. pretty much sums it up stopdiggin Sep 2023 #71
You called me a Garland basher. gab13by13 Sep 2023 #16
Why not? They got away with it when Hillary was about to win. housecat Sep 2023 #25
so why isn't the NRA defending Hunter? azureblue Sep 2023 #33
"I have no idea", On its face that's horrible in and of itself uponit7771 Sep 2023 #22
Hunter should have made a plea deal that stuck RandomNumbers Sep 2023 #41
Once again, it is the jury that convicted Daniels Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #47
and we just had to sneak in Merrick Garland there somewhere stopdiggin Sep 2023 #70
Deservedly so, a politically driven SC for a gun charge is disgusting on its face ... period end of uponit7771 Sep 2023 #21
If Hunter had committed a crime with the gun he lied to get, prosecute. Freethinker65 Sep 2023 #4
+1000 wnylib Sep 2023 #6
100+. MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #7
+1 uponit7771 Sep 2023 #24
there was also chatter azureblue Sep 2023 #34
+1000. Own it and get it over with. nt. RandomNumbers Sep 2023 #42
I'm betting malaise Sep 2023 #8
Joe should pardon not out of politics but because it is the compassionate thing to do usonian Sep 2023 #18
The Richard Painter tweet referenced in the article: sl8 Sep 2023 #19
Maybe she was Rebl2 Sep 2023 #23
Maybe Garland shouldn't appoint a special counsel in this case. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #26
Weed is legal as is alcohol, so who cares if she was under the influence? intheflow Sep 2023 #28
100+. nt MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #30
It's still illegal federally. sl8 Sep 2023 #31
She was in Denver where it's legal. intheflow Sep 2023 #38
It's illegal in the United States, including Denver. sl8 Sep 2023 #44
.... MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2023 #45
That's not how jurisdictions work. W_HAMILTON Sep 2023 #68
This message was self-deleted by its author stopdiggin Sep 2023 #72
I think federal law still applies in Denver -(nt)- stopdiggin Sep 2023 #73
It is not. ColinC Sep 2023 #43
Good lord, you want to go after her for smoking weed, intheflow Sep 2023 #46
You might be missing the point which is that the doj opened up a can of worms ecstatic Sep 2023 #59
Not "going after" her would be preferential treatment ColinC Sep 2023 #62
Weed is against federal law. Mr.Bill Sep 2023 #87
Thom Hartmann laid it all out gab13by13 Sep 2023 #53
Well, if you insist on going in circles: Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #55
+1. the 'gun app' charge stopdiggin Sep 2023 #75
I want Don Jr tested immediately. nt ecstatic Sep 2023 #57
Junior. KentuckyWoman Sep 2023 #66
Don't forget about that Madison Cawthorn guy... W_HAMILTON Sep 2023 #67
Well, maybe AncientOfDays Sep 2023 #78
K&R for visibility Blue Owl Sep 2023 #80
Except they aren't. FBaggins Sep 2023 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Now That DOJ Is Running F...»Reply #61