Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(5,929 posts)

15. Or would the 4th not apply to electronic search?

Fri Sep 22, 2023, 06:51 PM

Sep 2023

Digital records didn't exist in 1792 after all.

It's just not a good road to go down.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge says California's ban on high capacity magazines violates the Second Amendment. [View all] In It to Win It Sep 2023 OP

Not surprising, Thomas give them a sledgehammer in Bruen Amishman Sep 2023 #1

OH GOODIE! Conjuay Sep 2023 #2

W appointee from Cuba struggle4progress Sep 2023 #3

Gun shops in CA Zeitghost Sep 2023 #11

... roamer65 Sep 2023 #14

Why do they need more inspections? TexasDem69 Sep 2023 #17

Yep, there were no high capacity muskets. sinkingfeeling Sep 2023 #8

Sigh... fuck the 2nd Amendment lunatics. Initech Sep 2023 #9

There was no history of regulating magazine capacity SCantiGOP Sep 2023 #10

Incorrect nt sarisataka Sep 2023 #18

Not entirely true EX500rider Sep 2023 #20

Let's play their game Dave says Sep 2023 #12

What then would the 1st amendment be limited to? MichMan Sep 2023 #13

Or would the 4th not apply to electronic search? Amishman Sep 2023 #15

The human larynx Dave says Sep 2023 #16

Wait. jeffreyi Sep 2023 #19

It's three jmowreader Sep 2023 #21