HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Consistent with my much-a... » Reply #37

Response to WinkyDink (Reply #16)

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 10:36 AM

37. You may be right, but at the very least

the terror attacks were designed for an electoral coup, and they're being used to keep the president on the defensive via corporate media-covered bad publicity and partisan witch-hunt repug 'investigative oversight' efforts.

Remember the old days of terror attacks, when the terrorist org launched the attack because they couldn't take on the power they were against in a stand up fight. So they attacked where they could, then used the media coverage to get attention and support for their cause. A group would step forward and issue a "'credible' claim of responsibility". These days an attack occurs and the perps are far too 'humble' and diffident. Don't want to brag, now. But what's the point of getting media attention via a spectacular attack, then denying responsibility?

The people who attacked us in Egypt and Libya were paramilitary pros, well-trained and well-armed, not fundy fanatic amateurs. If we follow the trail from the characters who made -- and disseminated in Arab language -- the movie trailer (there's no movie) to the source that spread it on the ground in Libya and Egypt and called for demonstrations, we'll get closer to seeing who used those demonstrations as smoke screens for synchronized attacks. Rove repug foreign policy traitors hired some mercs through some Arab language version of Soldier of Fortune. A middle east version of Ronin, by right-wing rove repugs. Just a bald assertion on my part.

I can't discount your 'coup attempt', the repugs are always talking about assassination and secession, and constantly threaten civil war. But you don't have to convince me about a coup attempt, when we could get to the bottom of who attacked our 2 embassies and come up with repug traitors. And the squeeze out of military and intel people on this Petraeus scandal matches the elimination of Dulles, Bissell, Lemnitzer, Cabell and the gang after the Bay of Pigs. They were demoted or forced out for mis-serving the Prez with bad intel and trying to mislead us into a war, though the assassination after that did match the description of a coup.

What I'm trying to say is it's blatantly obvious that the repugs were running on 'Dems weak on foreign policy and national security'. A lot of info points to them being behind a false flag operation that 'proved' their false allegation. They're now definitely using the attack, false flag or not, for legislative branch witchhunts to attempt to cripple the administration. I don't disagree with you that they wanted to roll tanks down US streets, I just think it would be easier to discover that some rogue repug operators orchestrated the attacks than it would be to expose a coup attempt. If an attempt did occur, I'd love to see it exposed and proven, though.

Our government probably won't prove my bald assertion or your thesis, but we have a better shot at getting some repug 'rogue operators' hung out to dry by discovering their part in the attacks. If our Administration doesn't act overtly on either of our ideas, the action for Dems is to squash those bastards in their bull-shit 'investigative oversight' efforts, by lobbying Dems to attack their hyper partisan balderdash with censure in the Senate and House. And to demand that the repug controlled corporate media stop using our public air-waves to support those treasonous nazis in their efforts.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 40 replies Author Time Post
PCIntern Nov 2012 OP
broiles Nov 2012 #1
northoftheborder Nov 2012 #3
GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #23
OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #39
sandyshoes17 Nov 2012 #2
HangOnKids Nov 2012 #4
PCIntern Nov 2012 #5
DollarBillHines Nov 2012 #13
surrealAmerican Nov 2012 #22
DollarBillHines Nov 2012 #28
Enrique Nov 2012 #6
PCIntern Nov 2012 #8
nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #9
Enrique Nov 2012 #10
WinkyDink Nov 2012 #16
Enrique Nov 2012 #25
LineLineLineLineLineNew Reply You may be right, but at the very least
Mc Mike Nov 2012 #37
nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #7
DemocracyInaction Nov 2012 #11
KamaAina Nov 2012 #14
sandyshoes17 Nov 2012 #12
applegrove Nov 2012 #15
WinkyDink Nov 2012 #17
applegrove Nov 2012 #20
Ruby the Liberal Nov 2012 #18
Caretha Nov 2012 #19
Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #21
AndreaCG Nov 2012 #32
arthritisR_US Nov 2012 #34
Mc Mike Nov 2012 #36
arthritisR_US Nov 2012 #38
Mc Mike Nov 2012 #40
WinkyDink Nov 2012 #24
arthritisR_US Nov 2012 #30
WinkyDink Nov 2012 #33
arthritisR_US Nov 2012 #26
WinkyDink Nov 2012 #27
JVS Nov 2012 #29
PCIntern Nov 2012 #35
AntiFascist Nov 2012 #31
Please login to view edit histories.