Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

gab13by13

(32,483 posts)
Fri Sep 29, 2023, 10:13 AM Sep 2023

Some Tidbits On Merrick Garland [View all]

1. Garland agreed with Bill Barr that defaming someone was an official duty of the president. A district court disagreed. E. Jean Carroll had to delay her original lawsuit awaiting an Appeals court decision. After a year Garland withdrew his defense of Trump (the office) and now Carroll's suit can proceed.

2. Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are suing DOJ for invasion of privacy and violating their 5th Amendment rights. They filed a request to depose Donald Trump, Merrick Garland objected but another federal judge overruled Garland and Trump will be deposed.

3. The John Durham investigation. One of Durham's prosecutors, Nora Dannehy, who is well respected, up and quit the investigation for ethical reasons. A report was written up explaining her reasons. Merrick Garland is sitting on that report and there is talk of someone filing a FOIA to force Garland to make the report public.

Garland's special counsels

4. Appointment of David Weiss after 5 years of investigation of Hunter Biden. Why the need to make him a special counsel when he had all the power to investigate and indict as he pleased?

5. Appointment of Robert Hur as special counsel to investigate classified documents found at Joe Biden's properties. Mr. Hur has deposed 100 witnesses and has gone back to when President Biden was Senator Biden in his investigation. When will this shoe drop? Will it be a Comey moment.


Merrick Garland truly is showing Magats that he is not partisan against them. Job well done.

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some Tidbits On Merrick Garland [View all] gab13by13 Sep 2023 OP
Can't you see he's playing mikeysnot Sep 2023 #1
Unrec!!! JohnSJ Sep 2023 #2
why bother ? msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #22
For the same reason that the some seem obsessed with posting anti Garland posts on a JohnSJ Sep 2023 #25
"Trash this thread" is your friend. GoCubsGo Sep 2023 #38
This ongoing vendetta against Garland is getting so predictable. wnylib Sep 2023 #3
Thank you... agingdem Sep 2023 #12
The Garland bashing is so persistent and meaningless that wnylib Sep 2023 #15
truth. bigtree Sep 2023 #18
They secretly want a Bill-Barr type hatchet man to do for Biden what Barr did for Trump AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #32
you see no harm done with the actions listed in the op? msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #24
Should we criticize President Biden for not replacing Weiss when he became President? What should JohnSJ Sep 2023 #26
Really? That's your argument? Straw Man. and you know it. msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #28
No it isn't. The reason President Biden didn't replace Weiss was because he was currently JohnSJ Sep 2023 #29
I wonder why the persistence of Garland bashers on DU wnylib Sep 2023 #33
But, but, but, he playing eleventy dimensional chess... onecaliberal Sep 2023 #4
What do they say when people can't debate? gab13by13 Sep 2023 #5
What do they call people who write inflammatory posts and demand others debate them? AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #7
we had a term that used to be popular here bigtree Sep 2023 #19
That wasn't what I was thinking of, but it applies... AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #31
Where do you get this from? EndlessWire Sep 2023 #21
Where is this rule about ceasing prosecutions? AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #30
You do realize you are responding to your own OP? JohnSJ Sep 2023 #27
It's on the messenger to cite sources for the messenger's opinions. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #34
once again, Garland bashing without ANY corroborating proof bigtree Sep 2023 #6
6. If it weren't for the J6 Committee forcing his hand, DOJ would have let Trump skate for J6. 50 Shades Of Blue Sep 2023 #8
+1 That's what I think. Earth-shine Sep 2023 #9
If it were not for Cassidy Hutchinson's J6 testimony gab13by13 Sep 2023 #10
This. Also, trump announcing his 2024 run forced garland. onecaliberal Sep 2023 #11
fiction bigtree Sep 2023 #17
this is a lie bigtree Sep 2023 #20
completely false, again without any receipts bigtree Sep 2023 #14
if it wasn't for Merrick Garland "fleshing out" the agingdem Sep 2023 #16
How so? Can you for once be more specific than that? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #35
but of course you have always stopdiggin Sep 2023 #13
Yes. He demonstrated he would serve the office Captain Zero Sep 2023 #23
"Merrick Garland truly is showing Magats that he is not partisan against them." As he should. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #36
He has made missteps edhopper Sep 2023 #37
Without sourcing or providing any context to the "missteps"? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #39
The OP edhopper Sep 2023 #40
No he was not. He was pretty clear on what he thought they were. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some Tidbits On Merrick G...