Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,701 posts)
14. completely false, again without any receipts
Fri Sep 29, 2023, 12:30 PM
Sep 2023

...I have receipts.

This July 26, 2022 article by Carol D. Leonnig, the same person who claimed there wasn't attention at DOJ on the Trump WH, including the president, should give pause in accepting the claims that DOJ was negligent in the early days of Garland's time in office.

Justice Department investigators in April (2022) received phone records of key officials and aides in the Trump administration, including his former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, according to two people familiar with the matter. That effort is another indicator of how expansive the Jan. 6 probe had become, well before the high-profile, televised House hearings in June and July on the subject.

The Washington Post and other news organizations have previously written that the Justice Department is examining the conduct of Eastman, Giuliani and others in Trump’s orbit. But the degree of prosecutors’ interest in Trump’s actions has not been previously reported, nor has the review of senior Trump aides’ phone records.



or, consider this:

(@MuellerSheWrote) Before Jack Smith was appointed, Merrick Garland:

Seized John Eastman's phone
Seized Jeffrey Clark's phone
Seized Scott Perry's emails
Seized Eastman's emails
Seized Epshteyn's phone
Seized Mike Lindell's phone
Seized Mike Roman's phone
Seized Scott Perry's phone
Got Kash Patel's testimony
Appointed Windom
Appointed Cooney
Subpoenaed the fraudulent electors
Subpoenaed 7 state's election officials
Subpoenaed Sidney's PAC
Subpoenaed Rudy
Opened IG probe into Clark
Opened IG probe into DoJ response to 1/6
Negotiated subpoena for Meadows
Battled the 11th circuit for classified docs
Subpoenaed trump for classified docs
Subpoenaed trump for surveillance video
Executed a search warrant on trump
Convicted Bannon of contempt
Indicted Navarro for contempt
Subpoenaed the speakers from 1/6
Subpoenaed the organizers of 1/6
Secured seditious conspiracy convictions
Subpoenaed records for any member of congress involved in 1/6
Subpoenaed info on Jenna Ellis
Secured testimony from Mark Short
Secured testimony from Jacob Engel
Secured testimony from Philbin
Secured testimony from Cippollone
Subpoenaed info on trump's PACs
Won privilege battles for Short, Engel, and the Pats
Negotiated for Pence's subpoena
Seized the phone records of Meadows
Secured the 1/6 committee transcripts
Subpoenaed 7 secretaries of state

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1647043510544273408.html

...that's just what's in the public record. DOJ secrecy rules (correctly) prevent us from definitively knowing or saying just what they did in the early days of the investigation. The absence of that information may well be an open invitation for Garland critics to speculate the worst of his actions and intentions, but it's still bunk without that inside knowledge, which is essentially the bulk of the case, and not available in anything we read in the news.


posted by Bev54: Here is some of the timeline of the 1/6 investigation prior to Smith being appointed.

Some key dates in the January 6 investigation are:
January 4, 2021: DC authorities seize Enrique Tarrio’s phone
January 25, 2021: Stop the Steal VIP Brandon Straka arrested; DOJ IG opens probe into Jeff Clark and others
February 17, 2021: First allegedly cooperative interview with Straka
March 17, 2021: DOJ makes first tie between Oath Keepers investigation and Roger Stone
March 25, 2021: Second allegedly cooperative interview with Straka
April 21, 2021 (Lisa Monaco’s first day on the job): DOJ obtains warrant targeting Rudy Giuliani’s cell phones in Ukraine investigation
June 23, 2021: First Oath Keeper who interacted with Stone enters into cooperation agreement
August 19, 2021: Alex Jones sidekick Owen Shroyer, who participated in Friends of Stone list and served as a communication hub between Proud Boys and others, arrested
September 2021: DOJ subpoenas records from Sidney Powell grift
September 3, 2021: SDNY makes an ultimately successful bid to review all content on Rudy’s devices for privilege (making such content available if and when DOJ obtains January 6 warrant targeting Rudy)
Fall 2021: Thomas Windom appointed to form fake elector team
October 28, 2021: Merrick Garland tells Sheldon Whitehouse DOJ is following the money of January 6
November 2, 2021: Special Master Barbara Jones releases first tranche of materials from Rudy’s phones, including content through seizure
November 22, 2021: Trump appointee Carl Nichols asks James Pearce whether 18 USC 1512(c)(2) might be applied to someone like Trump (he would go on to issue an outlier opinion rejecting the application)
By December 2021: JP Cooney starts long-invisible investigation into financial side of January 6
December 2021: NARA and Mark Meadows begin process of completing his record of PRA-covered communications
December 10, 2021: Judge Dabney Friedrich (a Trump appointee) upholds application of 18 USC 1512(c)(2) to January 6
Mid-January 2022: DOJ finally obtains contents of Tarrio’s phone
January 5, 2022: Merrick Garland reiterates that DOJ is investigating the financial side of January 6
January 19, 2022: Jones releases remaining content from Rudy’s phones; SCOTUS declines to review DC Circuit rejection of Trump’s Executive Privilege claims with respect to January 6 subpoenas
January 5, 2022: Lisa Monaco confirms DOJ is investigating fake electors plot
February 18, 2022: In civil cases, Judge Amit Mehta rules it plausible that Trump and militias conspired to obstruct vote certification, as well that he aided and abetted assaults
March 2, 2022: Oath Keeper in charge of Stone security on January 6, Joshua James, enters into cooperation agreement
March 28, 2022: Judge David Carter issues crime-fraud ruling covering John Eastman’s communications with and on behalf of Trump
May 2022: DOJ subpoenas all NARA records provided to J6C
May 26, 2022: Subpoenas for fake electors plot including Rudy, John Eastman, Boris Epshteyn, Bernie Kerik, and Jenna Ellis, among others; warrants for email accounts of Jeffrey Clark, John Eastman, Ken Klukowski, and one non-lawyer
June 6, 2022: DOJ charges Proud Boy leaders with seditious conspiracy
June 21, 2022: Second set of fake electors subpoenas, adding Mike Roman and others, warrants for NV GOP officials and GA official
June 22, 2022: DOJ searches Jeffrey Clark’s home and seizes his phone
June 28, 2022: DOJ seizes John Eastman’s phone
June 23, 2022: DOJ completes exploitation (but not scoping) of Shroyer’s phone
June 24, 2022: Ali Alexander grand jury appearance
June 27, 2022: Then Chief Judge Beryl Howell permits prosecutors to obtain emails between Scott Perry and Clark and Eastman
July 22, 2022: Marc Short appears before grand jury
August 9, 2022: Scott Perry’s phone seized
August 2022: Mark Meadows provides previously withheld PRA covered materials to NARA
Early September, 2022: Pre-election legal process includes seizure of Boris Epshteyn and Mike Roman’s phones, subpoenas to key aides including Dan Scavino, Bernie Kerik, Stephen Miller, Mark Meadows, subpoenas pertaining to Trump’s PAC spending,
October 13, 2022: Marc Short and Greg Jacob make second, privilege-waived grand jury appearance
November 18, 2022: Merrick Garland appoints Jack Smith

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Some Tidbits On Merrick Garland [View all] gab13by13 Sep 2023 OP
Can't you see he's playing mikeysnot Sep 2023 #1
Unrec!!! JohnSJ Sep 2023 #2
why bother ? msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #22
For the same reason that the some seem obsessed with posting anti Garland posts on a JohnSJ Sep 2023 #25
"Trash this thread" is your friend. GoCubsGo Sep 2023 #38
This ongoing vendetta against Garland is getting so predictable. wnylib Sep 2023 #3
Thank you... agingdem Sep 2023 #12
The Garland bashing is so persistent and meaningless that wnylib Sep 2023 #15
truth. bigtree Sep 2023 #18
They secretly want a Bill-Barr type hatchet man to do for Biden what Barr did for Trump AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #32
you see no harm done with the actions listed in the op? msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #24
Should we criticize President Biden for not replacing Weiss when he became President? What should JohnSJ Sep 2023 #26
Really? That's your argument? Straw Man. and you know it. msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #28
No it isn't. The reason President Biden didn't replace Weiss was because he was currently JohnSJ Sep 2023 #29
I wonder why the persistence of Garland bashers on DU wnylib Sep 2023 #33
But, but, but, he playing eleventy dimensional chess... onecaliberal Sep 2023 #4
What do they say when people can't debate? gab13by13 Sep 2023 #5
What do they call people who write inflammatory posts and demand others debate them? AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #7
we had a term that used to be popular here bigtree Sep 2023 #19
That wasn't what I was thinking of, but it applies... AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #31
Where do you get this from? EndlessWire Sep 2023 #21
Where is this rule about ceasing prosecutions? AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #30
You do realize you are responding to your own OP? JohnSJ Sep 2023 #27
It's on the messenger to cite sources for the messenger's opinions. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #34
once again, Garland bashing without ANY corroborating proof bigtree Sep 2023 #6
6. If it weren't for the J6 Committee forcing his hand, DOJ would have let Trump skate for J6. 50 Shades Of Blue Sep 2023 #8
+1 That's what I think. Earth-shine Sep 2023 #9
If it were not for Cassidy Hutchinson's J6 testimony gab13by13 Sep 2023 #10
This. Also, trump announcing his 2024 run forced garland. onecaliberal Sep 2023 #11
fiction bigtree Sep 2023 #17
this is a lie bigtree Sep 2023 #20
completely false, again without any receipts bigtree Sep 2023 #14
if it wasn't for Merrick Garland "fleshing out" the agingdem Sep 2023 #16
How so? Can you for once be more specific than that? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #35
but of course you have always stopdiggin Sep 2023 #13
Yes. He demonstrated he would serve the office Captain Zero Sep 2023 #23
"Merrick Garland truly is showing Magats that he is not partisan against them." As he should. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #36
He has made missteps edhopper Sep 2023 #37
Without sourcing or providing any context to the "missteps"? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #39
The OP edhopper Sep 2023 #40
No he was not. He was pretty clear on what he thought they were. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some Tidbits On Merrick G...»Reply #14