General Discussion

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)

34. It's on the messenger to cite sources for the messenger's opinions.

Fri Sep 29, 2023, 05:38 PM

Sep 2023

But you hardly ever do. Any wonder why so many people question your motives?

You have been debated and proven wrong countless times. Enough is enough. You will get your rebuttal when you provide sources which would make your rant based on facts. Or not based on fact. Otherwise, it's idle and, frankly, tiresome chatter at the very best.

Your move!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Some Tidbits On Merrick Garland [View all] gab13by13 Sep 2023 OP

Can't you see he's playing mikeysnot Sep 2023 #1

Unrec!!! JohnSJ Sep 2023 #2

why bother ? msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #22

For the same reason that the some seem obsessed with posting anti Garland posts on a JohnSJ Sep 2023 #25

"Trash this thread" is your friend. GoCubsGo Sep 2023 #38

This ongoing vendetta against Garland is getting so predictable. wnylib Sep 2023 #3

Thank you... agingdem Sep 2023 #12

The Garland bashing is so persistent and meaningless that wnylib Sep 2023 #15

truth. bigtree Sep 2023 #18

They secretly want a Bill-Barr type hatchet man to do for Biden what Barr did for Trump AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #32

you see no harm done with the actions listed in the op? msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #24

Should we criticize President Biden for not replacing Weiss when he became President? What should JohnSJ Sep 2023 #26

Really? That's your argument? Straw Man. and you know it. msfiddlestix Sep 2023 #28

No it isn't. The reason President Biden didn't replace Weiss was because he was currently JohnSJ Sep 2023 #29

I wonder why the persistence of Garland bashers on DU wnylib Sep 2023 #33

But, but, but, he playing eleventy dimensional chess... onecaliberal Sep 2023 #4

What do they say when people can't debate? gab13by13 Sep 2023 #5

What do they call people who write inflammatory posts and demand others debate them? AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #7

we had a term that used to be popular here bigtree Sep 2023 #19

That wasn't what I was thinking of, but it applies... AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #31

Where do you get this from? EndlessWire Sep 2023 #21

Where is this rule about ceasing prosecutions? AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2023 #30

You do realize you are responding to your own OP? JohnSJ Sep 2023 #27

It's on the messenger to cite sources for the messenger's opinions. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #34

once again, Garland bashing without ANY corroborating proof bigtree Sep 2023 #6

6. If it weren't for the J6 Committee forcing his hand, DOJ would have let Trump skate for J6. 50 Shades Of Blue Sep 2023 #8

+1 That's what I think. Earth-shine Sep 2023 #9

If it were not for Cassidy Hutchinson's J6 testimony gab13by13 Sep 2023 #10

This. Also, trump announcing his 2024 run forced garland. onecaliberal Sep 2023 #11

fiction bigtree Sep 2023 #17

this is a lie bigtree Sep 2023 #20

completely false, again without any receipts bigtree Sep 2023 #14

if it wasn't for Merrick Garland "fleshing out" the agingdem Sep 2023 #16

How so? Can you for once be more specific than that? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #35

but of course you have always stopdiggin Sep 2023 #13

Yes. He demonstrated he would serve the office Captain Zero Sep 2023 #23

"Merrick Garland truly is showing Magats that he is not partisan against them." As he should. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #36

He has made missteps edhopper Sep 2023 #37

Without sourcing or providing any context to the "missteps"? Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #39

The OP edhopper Sep 2023 #40

No he was not. He was pretty clear on what he thought they were. Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #41