Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
22. Reference on quorum calls during filibusters: a 2011 CRS paper st senate.gov:
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 01:13 PM
Nov 2012

See the section on "Scheduling Filibusters", on PDF page 11 of http://www.senate.gov/CRSReports/crs-publish.cfm?pid='0E%2C*PLW%3D%22P%20%20%0A :

"Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate

...Scheduling filibusters

...late-night or all-night sessions put as much or more of a burden on the proponents of the question being debated than on its opponents.

The Senators participating in the filibuster need only ensure that at least one of their numberalways is present on the floor to speak. The proponents of the question, however, need to ensure that a majority of the Senate is present or at least available to respond to a quorum call or roll call vote.

If, late in the evening or in the middle of the night, a Senator suggests the absence of aquorum and a quorum does not appear, the Senate must adjourn or at least suspend itsproceedings until a quorum is established. This works to the advantage of the filibusteringSenators, so the burden rests on their opponents to ensure that the constitutional quorum requirement always can be met."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How about just abolish the whole thing. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #1
yes. ladjf Nov 2012 #2
This is a good compromise. cyclezealot Nov 2012 #9
No. To move Congress, we have to make sure that JDPriestly Nov 2012 #18
No. The filibuster does protect the voice of the minority. Yes it's been abused HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #23
"the guarantee that a minority as small as 1 senator can plead a case" Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #24
Well, that's the current circumstance yes. And yes, there is no doubt it is a tool to delay. HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #26
It isn't the last four years, it is the last 100 years. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #29
It's sort of difficult to look at this graph and not see an increased use of filibuster HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #34
I did not claim that we aren't in a filibuster storm. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #36
If they eliminated the rule that allows them to merely declare a filibuster without actually having Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #27
The Republicans has been abusing the system for 35 years. Panasonic Nov 2012 #32
That's easy to say when we are in power DefenseLawyer Nov 2012 #28
Yup, that is the downside. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #30
Then the Republican minority continues to become a super-minority Panasonic Nov 2012 #31
I'm happy he can admit he was wrong CanonRay Nov 2012 #3
Good! City Lights Nov 2012 #4
That's right... loyalsister Nov 2012 #35
Bout time... ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #5
This makes me very optimistic for our future. OnionPatch Nov 2012 #6
Make them actually filibuster. patrice Nov 2012 #7
At the risk of sounding unkind... duh. phantom power Nov 2012 #8
I was watching a documentary on LBJ last night ( A must see BTW) on Netflix srican69 Nov 2012 #10
But that was an extremely rare event Kaleva Nov 2012 #15
Don't we need Senator Sanders to filibuster... SHRED Nov 2012 #11
The thought of Senator Sanders filibustering makes me very happy. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #19
Can't happen: cloture vote would have the required 60 votes. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #25
Use McCain's craptastic threat to filibuster a Rice nomination as the perfect excuse RomneyLies Nov 2012 #12
I would only suggest sulphurdunn Nov 2012 #13
Reduce the number of votes needed to overcome the fuckybuster from 60 to 53. librechik Nov 2012 #14
Been sayin' that for years and years... PoliticalBiker Nov 2012 #16
Mr Reid, my suggestions for the opposing party filibustering are as follows: MyOpinion-2 Nov 2012 #17
I will believe it when I see it. I think the good Senator has acted tough before with rhett o rick Nov 2012 #20
One potential BIG problem with this reform: QUORUM CALLS could keep way more ProgressiveEconomist Nov 2012 #21
Reference on quorum calls during filibusters: a 2011 CRS paper st senate.gov: ProgressiveEconomist Nov 2012 #22
Time to go nuclear on them. Panasonic Nov 2012 #33
Someone please explain this to me Courtesy Flush Nov 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democratic Solution To Th...»Reply #22