Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

RandySF

(86,331 posts)
Wed Jan 18, 2012, 01:32 AM Jan 2012

Romney in 2007: Catching Bin Laden not worth the cost. [View all]

Romney Said Capturing Bin Laden Would Result In “Very Insignificant Increase In Safety” For America. And Such Effort Was “Not Worth Moving Heaven And Earth And Spending Billions Of Dollars” To Catch
One Person. “[Romney] said the country would be safer by only ‘a small percentage’ and would see ‘a very insignificant increase in safety’ if al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden was caught because another terrorist would rise to power. ‘It’s not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person,’
Romney said. Instead, he said he supports a broader strategy to defeat the Islamic jihad movement.” (Liz Sidoti, “Romney Says Rivals Switch Positions, Too,” The Associated Press, 4/26/07)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/78582788/McCain-2008-Oppo-File

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney in 2007: Catching ...