Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Democratic Senator Introduces Bill To Lift Social Security’s Tax Cap, Extend Solvency For Decades [View all]
This looks interesting, but, given that the media wants something dramatic like raising the age for SS and Medicare, you can be sure they will ignore this.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/11/16/1208701/democratic-senator-introduces-bill-to-lift-social-securitys-tax-cap-extend-its-solvency-for-decades/
...
This week, however, Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK) put forward a reform package that goes in the opposite direction, while still financially securing the programs trust fund for roughly the next seven decades. The Washington Posts Dylan Matthews laid out the details:
The Begich bill would lift the current payroll tax cap, which exempts wages in excess of a certain amount ($110,100 this year) from the tax. In turn, it would give high earners, who would pay more, additional benefits upon retirement, just as benefits increase as wages do for workers below the cap. [ ]
It also increases benefits across-the-board. While Bowles-Simpson and Domenici-Rivlin adopt a stingier chained CPI measure for inflation, Begich adopts CPI-E, or a measure that specifically captures inflation in goods that seniors buy.
Due to deteriorated health and other considerations, goods seniors buy tend to be more expensive than those younger people purchase. Begichs CPI-E change would mean, effectively, a 4.5 percent benefit increase for the programs beneficiaries, including not just seniors but their designated survivors and disabled Americans as well.
...
This week, however, Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK) put forward a reform package that goes in the opposite direction, while still financially securing the programs trust fund for roughly the next seven decades. The Washington Posts Dylan Matthews laid out the details:
The Begich bill would lift the current payroll tax cap, which exempts wages in excess of a certain amount ($110,100 this year) from the tax. In turn, it would give high earners, who would pay more, additional benefits upon retirement, just as benefits increase as wages do for workers below the cap. [ ]
It also increases benefits across-the-board. While Bowles-Simpson and Domenici-Rivlin adopt a stingier chained CPI measure for inflation, Begich adopts CPI-E, or a measure that specifically captures inflation in goods that seniors buy.
Due to deteriorated health and other considerations, goods seniors buy tend to be more expensive than those younger people purchase. Begichs CPI-E change would mean, effectively, a 4.5 percent benefit increase for the programs beneficiaries, including not just seniors but their designated survivors and disabled Americans as well.
...
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic Senator Introduces Bill To Lift Social Security’s Tax Cap, Extend Solvency For Decades [View all]
Mass
Nov 2012
OP
I will be contacting my 2 Senators about this. Both are Democrats, but I trust neither on this.
forestpath
Nov 2012
#3
Ding, Ding, Ding .... winner! Solvent for decades, unlike, say, everything else.
SomeGuyInEagan
Nov 2012
#21
Sen Begich has wisely included language that will diffuse the usual RW argument against lifting
stopbush
Nov 2012
#18
Great idea...but why not make it more simple by just raising the payroll cap as much as needed.
Auntie Bush
Nov 2012
#19
This is kind of a step in the right direction but I think there needs to be some way
TheKentuckian
Nov 2012
#33
I fully support this and have for years. Obama talked about lifting the cap in 08
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2012
#52
Many benefit receivers need this.They have to live on less than $25,000. a year & that's if you are
judesedit
Nov 2012
#63