Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Whoops! That's ALSO A War Crime [View all]redqueen
(115,186 posts)82. Is anyone surprised
From the Vox link:
Second, a columnist at Israels Haaretz newspaper unearthed evidence that Netanyahu has intentionally propped up Hamas rule in Gaza seeing Palestinian extremism as a bulwark against a two-state solution to the conflict.
Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas, the prime minister reportedly said at a 2019 meeting of his Likud party. This is part of our strategy to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.
These exact comments have not yet been confirmed by other sources. But the Times of Israels Tal Schneider wrote on Sunday that Netanyahus reported words are in line with the policy that he implemented, which did little to challenge and in some ways bolstered Hamass control over the Gaza Strip. Moreover, Schneider notes, the same messaging was repeated by right-wing commentators, who may have received briefings on the matter or talked to Likud higher-ups and understood the message. Some Netanyahu confidants have said the same thing, as have outside experts.
Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas, the prime minister reportedly said at a 2019 meeting of his Likud party. This is part of our strategy to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.
These exact comments have not yet been confirmed by other sources. But the Times of Israels Tal Schneider wrote on Sunday that Netanyahus reported words are in line with the policy that he implemented, which did little to challenge and in some ways bolstered Hamass control over the Gaza Strip. Moreover, Schneider notes, the same messaging was repeated by right-wing commentators, who may have received briefings on the matter or talked to Likud higher-ups and understood the message. Some Netanyahu confidants have said the same thing, as have outside experts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
203 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The very nature and structure of the UN limits it and can leave its committees sometimes open to
hlthe2b
Oct 2023
#26
It was never meant to be a judicary equivalent. That is the World Court that the US declined to
hlthe2b
Oct 2023
#63
Think again about why folks might be skeptical when the "UN" source isn't named.
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#121
Think again why there are no sources and not even a name for the "UN" expert.
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#122
The name you can't provide is Francesca Albanese. She was interviewed on last week.
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#160
Sorry, "Unnamed guy on unlinked show said something" is simply not good enough.
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#162
They only do what the people who finance them want them to do. Kind of like our R's in congress.
LiberalArkie
Oct 2023
#51
maybe when 1 or 2 people do something, but when thousands of rockets worth million start
LiberalArkie
Oct 2023
#54
I'm with LiberalArkie on this one. Yes, Iran ruled by the Ayatollahs is definitely a
PatrickforB
Oct 2023
#151
If for nothing else UNICEF and other health, medical care, food etc. it is well
JohnSJ
Oct 2023
#152
Well, that is and has long been the RW and Trump stance on the UN. Interesting that you would agree
hlthe2b
Oct 2023
#22
As it happens I have developed a few work-arounds which I will be happy to share with you
Hekate
Oct 2023
#73
I am not at all confused. I've been here over 20 years, and I learned to cite sources decades before
Hekate
Oct 2023
#84
I just posted one. Sorry, but "Some guy on a show I can't name said something."
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#175
War crimes don't give a damn what anyone thinks...it's still a crime, by clear legal definition...
Alexander Of Assyria
Oct 2023
#97
And after Hamas is destroyed, there'll be another terrorist organization born.
czarjak
Oct 2023
#117
First, Ukraine is not a terrorist organization, and it doesn't target civilians.
Beastly Boy
Oct 2023
#113
Gaza is not a nation, can't declare war, that's a Western fiction...and 2 million people living
Alexander Of Assyria
Oct 2023
#118
Food and water? Most sieges of towns and cities had innocent families in the middle.
NutmegYankee
Oct 2023
#71
Literally advocating for a war crime against a city of 2 million...regressing to the Stone Age wars?
Alexander Of Assyria
Oct 2023
#119
You mean the Palestinians after all these years didn't build any infrastructure
Historic NY
Oct 2023
#21
Why do you think 1/2 the population are children? Their parents and grandparents have already been
onecaliberal
Oct 2023
#24
In contested areas, there can be a race to have more children than the other guys
meadowlander
Oct 2023
#67
It might be the woman called out by our UN ambassador for her history of anti-Semitism,
lapucelle
Oct 2023
#131
and Bibi is trying to control the courts to protect his criiminal rightwing ass. Israel is divided
housecat
Oct 2023
#40
Israel IS ignoring doing war crimes, UN is just the messenger...but then again a Eric and israel
Alexander Of Assyria
Oct 2023
#98
How can people who initiate collective punishment have an argument in this context, they should stop
uponit7771
Oct 2023
#106
It is a crime against humanity. The Israeli Def Minister called Palestinians "human animals"
Goddessartist
Oct 2023
#48
Did the UN representative cited to a provision of the Geneva Convention or Hague Protocol?
TomSlick
Oct 2023
#96
Here is MY question-- how WAS Israel supposed to respond to this awful attack???
LymphocyteLover
Oct 2023
#167
Anything that harms civilians is war crime. Starving them is just as bad as shooting them.
Martin68
Oct 2023
#174
Well, duh. But when civilians die because they were not allowed to get water, food or medical treatment, that is a war crime.
Martin68
Oct 2023
#184
Show me one war in which either combatant had the power to completely cut off all water, power, and
Martin68
Oct 2023
#188
You seem to be willfully ignoring the obvious. Japan had food and water no matter who blockaded them.
Martin68
Oct 2023
#196
Food insecurity at a the time was a product of the wartime effort that drafted farmers to fight the war,
Martin68
Oct 2023
#202
I have no idea what you are trying to say. Why would I agree that is not true? I just cited the
Martin68
Oct 2023
#189
"According to Section 6(1)(b)(xxv), "ntentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of
Martin68
Oct 2023
#197
"willfully impeding relief supplies" is not the same as you have to supply them
EX500rider
Oct 2023
#200