Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ffr

(22,670 posts)
Tue Nov 7, 2023, 06:13 PM Nov 2023

"Not credible": Experts say Cannon's new orders suggest she "has her thumb on the scale for TFG" [View all]

"She needs to go back to judges’ school," says ex-U.S. attorney.

U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon is continuously straying from legal principle in her handling of TFG's classified documents case after she rebuked special counsel Jack Smith for alerting her to the former president's motion to delay his Washington, D.C. federal case, legal experts argued. That order, coupled with her signal last week that she may further delay the trial in line with the defense's request, has raised alarms for former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, who described Cannon's criticism of prosecutors as "off base."

"Many people have a sense Judge Cannon has her thumb on the scale for TFG," Vance said on X, formerly Twitter. "Perhaps Judge Cannon needs to remember what this case is about: alleged crimes regarding the treatment of highly classified documents by a former president — allegations that are backed up by evidence collected during execution of a court-ordered search warrant," Vance wrote in her newsletter. "Instead it seems to have devolved into an inexplicable grudge match with the Special Counsel's office on her part."

"Biased or not, Cannon simply doesn’t have game; and she masks it with prickly remonstrations of the government," former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman tweeted. "She needs to go back to judges’ school, except there isn’t such a place.
...
"Does she believe that the case is too complicated to try as soon as May, even though the lawyers have had months to prepare and will have six more months before May? That's not credible," he said, noting that Trump's D.C. case, though "more complicated," is proceeding swiftly. - Salon

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Not credible": Experts s...