Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(51,126 posts)
10. I'm guessing she means they won't even bother to pay the small fee to register the copyright.
Sat Nov 11, 2023, 09:35 PM
Nov 2023

EDITING to add that she's talking about the customized AI-generated films people will be able to request...or which will be offered to them like YouTube recommendations, maybe. Churned out instantly by AI. Put your favorite long-deceased actors in a film with living actors, in any location you wish, any type of film you wish. Add yourself to the cast, if you'd like. Make yourself the star. AI and the studios controlling it and profiting from it will oblige. No real acting from real actors necessary. No cinematographers, directors, makeup artists, and so on, necessary. No screenwriters necessary. Existing films ripped off, and much more profit for the studios and top execs.

It will be interesting to see what is actually in the agreement. LudwigPastorius Nov 2023 #1
Yes. But it's worrisome that they haven't released those details on AI yet. highplainsdem Nov 2023 #7
Ask the music industry about Napster gulliver Nov 2023 #2
I think that horse is out of the barn and a couple of states away by now. TwilightZone Nov 2023 #3
Justine ❤️ underpants Nov 2023 #4
I remember Delphinus Nov 2023 #5
I agree completely with what you wrote here: highplainsdem Nov 2023 #8
If the scumbag streaming companies would pay residuals then fine JanMichael Nov 2023 #6
She had the law wrong, so I'll withhold my opinion Ms. Toad Nov 2023 #9
I'm guessing she means they won't even bother to pay the small fee to register the copyright. highplainsdem Nov 2023 #10
I suspect she simply doesn't know the law. Ms. Toad Nov 2023 #11
that sounds so condescending orleans Nov 2023 #12
Yes. n/t Ms. Toad Nov 2023 #13
so then the whole copyright idea for AI generated material is moot since you have to be human to orleans Nov 2023 #14
She meant enforcing copyright. She wasn't being precise with her language. Yavin4 Nov 2023 #16
passive copyright doesn't apply to works created by generative AI, though, does it? fishwax Nov 2023 #18
she was once a very big star on television.......... DemocraticPatriot Nov 2023 #15
AI actually could be a good thing for the arts. Yavin4 Nov 2023 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justine Bateman is NOT ha...»Reply #10