Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Moostache

(11,204 posts)
10. Agreed...
Tue Nov 14, 2023, 12:38 PM
Nov 2023

Religious freedom applies ONLY to the practice of your religion in private and free from state sanctioned efforts to outlaw it. It does NOT (and NEVER has) grant one free reign to do anything they want and later claim protections. Its like morons who squeal about 'free speech' without realizing that CONSEQUNECES from speech are NOT protected...you are ALWAYS free to say stupid shit, but you are also liable for the reactions and consequences of said stupid shit!

Religion in general still receives far too much deference in the public square. I begrudge no one their right to rub bat guano on themselves and call it spiritual or to ritualistically celebrate cannibalism with crackers and wine in their private, voluntary assemblies...but the second they try to haul it out of the churches and into politics or the public domain, then its lights out and a very hard "no".

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, how about that? CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2023 #1
Only if you put the spotlight on them maxrandb Nov 2023 #7
Agreed, but it is good to see they respond to public pressure. Martin68 Nov 2023 #14
and as usual mountain grammy Nov 2023 #21
"if you put the spotlight on them", they do what roaches do. Run away and hide, it's every insect for itself! jaxexpat Nov 2023 #22
$50 says that the dissenters includes Thomas... Moostache Nov 2023 #8
I'd rather have the $50 JoseBalow Nov 2023 #20
Yes, a refreshing change from the usual redqueen Nov 2023 #11
I'm cynical... Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2023 #34
Good point. ShazzieB Nov 2023 #35
Excellent! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2023 #2
Being nurses, they ought to know better. appleannie1 Nov 2023 #3
My daughter, an ICU physician assistant, says the same thing. Liberty Belle Nov 2023 #17
I would argue that individuals have no more religious freedom to refuse vaccines.... lastlib Nov 2023 #25
Kind of surprising with this court, but good news...nt Wounded Bear Nov 2023 #4
"... citing religious freedom"? Grins Nov 2023 #5
Agreed... Moostache Nov 2023 #10
I'm stunned! 50 Shades Of Blue Nov 2023 #6
Hey Robert Kennedy Jr... BlueIdaho Nov 2023 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2023 #31
So you have religious freedom to not bake a cake or pay for birth control, but they can inject you at will bucolic_frolic Nov 2023 #12
You can choose not to patronize a bigoted bakery, but you have no choice on hospitals usually. Liberty Belle Nov 2023 #19
The opinion as dictated by the Pope may have some influence, ... JustABozoOnThisBus Nov 2023 #30
Good malaise Nov 2023 #13
Love how the anti vaxxers seem to think that only their rights should count. appleannie1 Nov 2023 #15
they are such hypocrites Skittles Nov 2023 #37
There was a time when the supremes would not allow 50 cal weapons to be sold to the public, LiberalArkie Nov 2023 #16
That's an interesting statement. When did SCOTUS not allow .50 calibre rifles and/or ammo? SYFROYH Nov 2023 #26
Next you could lose your right to beat heretics with clubs studded with rusty nails! struggle4progress Nov 2023 #18
Even the Trump Justices don't want crazy unvaxxed nurses treating them. nt SunSeeker Nov 2023 #23
Jacobson v Massachusetts Heftylefty Nov 2023 #24
Thanks, and welcome to DU! Informative post! keopeli Nov 2023 #29
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2023 #38
No one mandated that they HAD to be nurses. lapfog_1 Nov 2023 #27
Same with pharmacists drmeow Nov 2023 #32
Nurses who refuse to be vaccinated are a threat to both themselves and their patients. patphil Nov 2023 #28
Couldn't seem to delete this post. Martin68 Nov 2023 #33
Third Circuit had dismissed the appeal as moot: sl8 Nov 2023 #36
Great news, BUT bluestarone Nov 2023 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Delivers Bl...»Reply #10