Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Anonymous has definitive proof that Rove tried to hack the vote, present it. [View all]pnwmom
(109,393 posts)243. Of course it should -- if they're not just making up a good story
and trying to get undeserved credit for Romney's loss.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
385 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Anonymous has definitive proof that Rove tried to hack the vote, present it. [View all]
ProSense
Nov 2012
OP
Do you actually think you're going to stop people from posting their opinions on this board?....
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#233
Maybe you could choose not to read these threads, instead of being, you know,
WinkyDink
Nov 2012
#253
Exactly. It's been proven every way ....statistically, technically, timing, cover-up....
loudsue
Nov 2012
#327
Send it to Mother Jones, Atlantic Monthly and about 1/2 a dozen other news outlets
TalkingDog
Nov 2012
#162
The foreign press has written about electronically flipping the primary for Romney.
reusrename
Nov 2012
#170
It's suddenly become obvious that you don't have a grasp of the question being raised here.
reusrename
Nov 2012
#361
That quoted bit is the claim being made by the fellow doing this statistical analysis.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#363
yes, peer review is necessary - can't image it taking more than another month or two
reusrename
Nov 2012
#368
There is absolutely NOTHING more dangerous about sharing the code and logs
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#348
But who is Anon referring to in this video to give info to? Wish they would turn proof over.
glinda
Nov 2012
#309
I agree Manny. There is no reason for Anon to expose themselves. I doubt that they have any
rhett o rick
Nov 2012
#131
'No reason', apart from basic honesty, that is, and a desire not to be complicit
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2012
#353
His untouchability is determined by his masters.But they have a long history of protecting their own
rhett o rick
Nov 2012
#127
Kinda like how Mike Connell got his comeuppance when he died in that plane crash...
cascadiance
Nov 2012
#240
But they can be assured that they would be. I just love threads like this.
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#186
You need to read and listen to Stephen Spoonamore to understand. They did not use the
Dustlawyer
Nov 2012
#5
That is also just a bunch of BS, just like the current deal, piled higher and deeper
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#72
It is a n incontrovertable fact that the primary was electronically flipped.
reusrename
Nov 2012
#177
I do understand you much better now. You are definitely on the right track.
reusrename
Nov 2012
#377
The reason you "round up the others" is you have no other reliable measurement.
jeff47
Nov 2012
#378
No, he may very well be right. But he needs to use data to show he is right. (nt)
jeff47
Nov 2012
#382
Well, I agree with your claim, but this isn't really a statistical abnormality, it's an algorithm.
reusrename
Nov 2012
#325
It's remarkable that one of the most exacting scientific practices there is (programming)
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2012
#70
You're closer to getting this than most. Computer science forensics could find the
AikidoSoul
Nov 2012
#150
Where's the code? Where's the code? Where's the code? Where's the code?
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2012
#11
Nor is it up to zealots to prove their god exists because they already know he does
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#86
It's not ProSense who "demands" it. It's basic modern scientific claim-making
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2012
#19
When you are leaning over to believe something, it looks like others are tilting
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#91
But you are willing to trust these people you don't know to have done something
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#319
Do you have any idea what it takes to develop software for embedded systems?
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#320
Uh huh. That's why when I patch code, I can show the before/after edits and explain why.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#347
Sure. Every time a CT gains traction on DU, the people asking questions are said to be 'scared'.
randome
Nov 2012
#290
Worst than a fairy tale, it is disinformation supporting disinformation, intended to deceive voters
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#95
It reminds me of faith in the supernatural. Proof is irrelevant, the Savior is coming.
freshwest
Nov 2012
#139
Might as well. Going in circles, like arguing with repukes. Just believe, it'll all gonna happen!
freshwest
Nov 2012
#192
Anonymous is not a part of the government, so the evidence would be admissible. The problem
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#187
This just in: ProSense stands up for poor put upon Karl Rove who has been accused of evildoing
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#33
Rove is the Devil; Anonymous is God...It's time to leave the faith-reasoning to the theologians
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2012
#73
I am defending Rove. I think he failed all by himself w/o any help from a bullshit story!
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#188
no shit. blind and unquestioning partisonship no matter which party makes for strange bedfellows!"
boilerbabe
Nov 2012
#178
Not to me, it doesn't.. It sounds like she's asking for accountability and for that
Cha
Nov 2012
#275
You are correct. They need to put up or shut up. If they cannot or will not provide proof,
patricia92243
Nov 2012
#60
If Velvet Revolution didn't have a DONATE button, would this "Election Fraud" even exist?
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#67
Me too, and I know exactly how they did it and who did. That's why I know this is BS thru and thru
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#124
"If you think the Dems are lily white in the area of voter fraud, I have a bridge to sell you."
ProSense
Nov 2012
#123
If you want "evidence" vote for someone who will give you "investigations"
Eyes of the World
Nov 2012
#130
"Where's your evidence Anonymous was not able to do what they claimed to have done?"
ProSense
Nov 2012
#137
LOL. You're normally a smart poster, but you just don't get Anonymous, do you? nt.
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#231
There is plent of evidence from 2000 on why does the Obama administration need
aandegoons
Nov 2012
#135
This is the most sensible "no they didn't" post in this thread. I suspect you are 100% correct,
Dark n Stormy Knight
Nov 2012
#331
They have said enough that any competent ivestigative/intelligence organization should be able
geckosfeet
Nov 2012
#152
Responses indicate that we're pretty scattered on this election fraud issue.
Gregorian
Nov 2012
#175
"Seriously, there's really nothing they could present to prove their claims."
ProSense
Nov 2012
#185
Just Because People Believe It's PLAUSIBLE Doesn't Mean People Believe It Definitely Happened
Skraxx
Nov 2012
#298
Sorry but that's not their job. They have brought forth suspicions that this happened.
Cleita
Nov 2012
#181
I think there is more than a loony suspicion here. I believe a warrant to investigate the
Cleita
Nov 2012
#190
Here's what I know having watched this closely at the time re: Ohio + Anonymous
flamingdem
Nov 2012
#194
There has been proof since 2000, and during every election since. there are books and movies on the s
robinlynne
Nov 2012
#204
Interesting thought experiments: what evidence would satisfy vote fraud
coalition_unwilling
Nov 2012
#224
I will go much more modest: what evidence would convince me of this particular claim
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2012
#232
I really think anonymous/wikileaks/Fitrakis jumped the gun, understandably they believed
flamingdem
Nov 2012
#235
Fair enough. I'm a big believer in Occam's Razor and, barring presentation
coalition_unwilling
Nov 2012
#237
That's fine...I've said throughout this thread that there's nothing wrong with
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2012
#261
You need to look at the stuff Mike Collins has published on algorithmic vote flipping.
reusrename
Nov 2012
#269
I'm sure Anon will give us the whole story when, where and how they want to. They keep their id's
judesedit
Nov 2012
#244
What if it can no longer BE proven, being a transitory and random hacking program?
WinkyDink
Nov 2012
#252
Well, why don't you elucidate just HOW it "was a joke," m-kay? Rove wasn't & isn't laughing.
WinkyDink
Nov 2012
#276
I haven't found really anything on Rove on AnonNews which is interesting.
rightsideout
Nov 2012
#328
"This isn't a movie.....This is real life, and Rove needs to be investigated if
merrily
Nov 2012
#329