Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)You Know You're A Paulbot When... [View all]
You Know You're A Paulbot When...
by Mets102
You write something along the lines of:
Or you write something like:
While those quotes are purely fictitious, they do represent the ideas espoused by some on the left. We all know that there is an infestation of Paulbots at this site. Denise Oliver Velez had a great, and funny, diary about it last Friday. Unfortunately, it's not just limited to this site and the pseudonymous people here. We also see it from prominent names, such as Glenn Greenwald, which this diary, and several comments therein, documents.
Despite what some people say, when one makes comments along the lines of those written above, that is a defense of, and advocacy for, Ron Paul. Writing 95 words of praise, followed by 5 words of damnation is exactly that. Opening with a few words criticizing him, and closing with a few words criticizing him, but having the middle, and bulk of the comment or piece, being absolutely effusive about Ron Paul is nothing more than a defense of, and advocacy for, Ron Paul. It is easy enough to see through the faint, and insubstantial, words of damnation and get to the heart of the comment.
I know this has been said time and again, both by myself and others, but one should not be praising Ron Paul under any circumstances. He may come to some of the same end goals as us in certain areas of foreign policy, but he comes to them for exactly the wrong reasons. In addition, that ignores how truly horrific he is when it comes to every other issue under the sun. He wants to criminalize abortion. He has no problem with states criminalizing conduct between consenting adults. He has no problem with states criminalizing drugs. And that is just the start of it. As has been repeatedly said, his issue is about states' rights and lessening federal power.
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/08/1052760/-You-Know-Youre-A-Paulbot-When
by Mets102
You write something along the lines of:
Ron Paul is great in his opposition to the wars and his desire to cut military spending and his opposition to the military-industrial complex. He was right about Afghanistan. He was right about Iraq. We shouldn't be launching these imperialistic wars just because we can and we feel like it. He's right that it's wrong to do so. He's right that we can't afford to do. And, oh yeah, I know he sucks on everything else.
Or you write something like:
Yeah, Ron Paul wants to pull us out of the UN, but he also wants to get us out of NATO, which has no purpose now that the Cold War is over. He also opposed both Afghanistan and Iraq from the outset and wouldn't have let the British pull us into World War II. If our foreign policy followed his outlook, we, and the world, would be a much better place for it. And, yes, I know, he's really bad about women's rights, civll rights, and pretty much anything else.
While those quotes are purely fictitious, they do represent the ideas espoused by some on the left. We all know that there is an infestation of Paulbots at this site. Denise Oliver Velez had a great, and funny, diary about it last Friday. Unfortunately, it's not just limited to this site and the pseudonymous people here. We also see it from prominent names, such as Glenn Greenwald, which this diary, and several comments therein, documents.
Despite what some people say, when one makes comments along the lines of those written above, that is a defense of, and advocacy for, Ron Paul. Writing 95 words of praise, followed by 5 words of damnation is exactly that. Opening with a few words criticizing him, and closing with a few words criticizing him, but having the middle, and bulk of the comment or piece, being absolutely effusive about Ron Paul is nothing more than a defense of, and advocacy for, Ron Paul. It is easy enough to see through the faint, and insubstantial, words of damnation and get to the heart of the comment.
I know this has been said time and again, both by myself and others, but one should not be praising Ron Paul under any circumstances. He may come to some of the same end goals as us in certain areas of foreign policy, but he comes to them for exactly the wrong reasons. In addition, that ignores how truly horrific he is when it comes to every other issue under the sun. He wants to criminalize abortion. He has no problem with states criminalizing conduct between consenting adults. He has no problem with states criminalizing drugs. And that is just the start of it. As has been repeatedly said, his issue is about states' rights and lessening federal power.
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/08/1052760/-You-Know-Youre-A-Paulbot-When
Ron Paul Touts Endorsement From Pastor Who Railed Against Sodomites
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002183905
New Batch Of Ron Paul Newsletters Out
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002179317
Ron Paul's Vision For a Free Society Based on Liberty
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002176020
Ron Paul wants to build more bases in the U.S.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002177891
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You know you are a fanatic when you cannot bear that someone else can understand that an
JDPriestly
Jan 2012
#9
Because Pakistan is next door. It has Muslim fanaticism, nuclear weapons, was
JDPriestly
Jan 2012
#69
We do not need to invade Turkey. We are already there and have been for a long time.
JDPriestly
Jan 2012
#95
It's precisely because Paul raises those issues that some refuse to separate him from the issues..
Fumesucker
Jan 2012
#14
The poster that keeps writing about Ron Paul is the one that keeps bringing him up
cpwm17
Jan 2012
#31
THIS IS A CLEAR defense of Ron Paul. Instead of addressing the issue you swipe at Obama with BS.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#25
I'm asking you why you chose to bring up Rick Warren, seems a bit...off-topic.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#44
I guess just bashing the President by any means necessary is just a hobby then.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#46
I think this is actually reverse McCarthyism, as you seem to be the paranoid one.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#48
You're the one who didn't even understand that she was talking about Rick Warren
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2012
#54
Huh? Who was talking about Rick Warren? The sodomites reference was from Reverend Voddie Baucham.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#58
"tearing down racist, anti-gay, anti-women, corporate tools for holding those views is what 'we' do"
redqueen
Jan 2012
#39
I don't feel any need to deny that Ron Paul is right about some things.
Donald Ian Rankin
Jan 2012
#27
Many of us have attempted to understand why it is that Paul supporters
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#43
Or maybe it's b/c Paul is a racist homophobe and we are outraged that such a person could even
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#68
... if you agree with EVERYTHING that Ron Paul says. Fortunately there are doesn't seem
madinmaryland
Jan 2012
#64