We've been fighting poverty all wrong [View all]
The success of the expanded child tax credit shows why anti-poverty programs should be unconditional.
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23965898/child-poverty-expanded-child-tax-credit-economy-welfare-phase-ins
Background:
Since 1975, the safety net excluded the poorest from assistance, believing that this would motivate them to get a job. That's called a phase-in. Removing a phase-in gives assistance starting with zero income.
The consensus excluding the poorest Americans from some forms of government assistance through phase-ins held until President Joe Bidens 2021 American Rescue Plan. Its anti-poverty centerpiece was to cut phase-ins from the existing CTC and crank up the payment, creating whats known as the expanded CTC.
The results were historic. Over the course of 2021, child poverty was cut nearly in half, and the long-running fear at the heart of the American welfare system that unconditional aid would discourage work never came to pass.
...
Then, to the dismay of advocates and recipients alike, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) blocked the Democratic Partys effort to make the expansion permanent, fearing, among other familiar concerns like the cost, that recipients would just buy drugs (the data shows that recipients spent the money on food, clothes, utilities, rent, and education). Come 2022, phase-ins returned to the CTC, approximately 3.7 million children were immediately thrust back into poverty in January, and the rest of the year saw the sharpest rise in the history of recorded child poverty rates.
...
Unconditional anti-poverty policies would mark a significant shift from the safety net of the past few decades. But the year-long experiment with eliminating phase-ins was the largest signal yet that they work, at least in the short term. And in the long term, tenuous concerns over what might happen generations down the line do not justify leaving millions of children in avoidable poverty today.
Lots more at Vox.
Reminder to get out the vote!!!