General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why? Why would Anonymous release evidence against Rove? [View all]WCLinolVir
(951 posts)You are the antithesis of scientific thought. You would have held science back. In the dark ages. I'm sorry to be unpleasant but if the great minds of science had not been willing to theorize in the absence of absolute proof, and devised studies that take into the account unknown, or theorized factors, and were able to construct tests to confirm theories identifying the presence of that which is unseen, and gain a better understanding of what to look for and where to find it, then science would have stalled.. Much of the advances in physical science were accomplished this way. The ignorance of assertion based only on known factors , is understood to be a detriment to scientific discovery. We only know what we are able to test for. It does not mean we are able to test for what exists. The same may be said for your comment about the afterlife. Which I have experienced and you, obviously have not. Therefore, for you it does not exist. Guess what? Science is learning how to quantitatively test for such phenomena. I'm not going to point out the data or bother trying to convince you. Could not care less.
Math is a thing of beauty. The voter anomalies in the primaries speak for themselves. They don't need a belief attached to them. You can't dismiss something incontrovertible. Otherwise it's a bias.
The new agers have been saying things for decades that are very much in vogue in theoretical physics. Parts of which we can now test for. It just took some imagination to acknowledge our ignorance.