General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Public nudity ban eyed in fed-up San Francisco [View all]NuttyFluffers
(6,811 posts)hey, that ordinance obviously must include new interpretations on breast feeding.
are breasts related to genitals?
are breasts a strange special class unto itself (just like gay people who married before prop H8te are special class of citizens still legally married regardless of the prop because of Federal Constitution's no ex post facto clause)?
if breasts aren't genitals, can women now walk around without the band-aids on their nipples?
time for the court to decide!
ah ha ha ha! the second you accidentally split your pants in SF, it'll be a crime! ah ha ha ha ha! so stupid! people will be mandated to wear underwear to prevent a wardrobe malfunction!
do it! totally do it! i fucking dare you! ah ha ha ha ha! this might be an awesome fight to watch! think how tied up the courts and police will be, how much money the city would hemorrhage. DO IT! I'm across the bay, ENTERTAIN ME!