General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Stuff That (Increasingly Desperately Disillusioned) Obama Supporters Say [View all]Cherchez la Femme
(2,488 posts)I posted this over a month ago:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/100232148#post236
Way back in 2004 it was the Log Cabin Republicans who brought DADT to court (Log Cabin Republicans v. United States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States) which ruled FOR them (i.e. AGAINST DADT).
Obama had no option but to discontinue DADT, even though they asked for an injunction against the ruling. Prior to that there had been a lot of foot-dragging INCLUDING his DOJ using, in court, the Bushie argument that gays were prone to incest and bestiality.
Read http://www.thepostgameshow.com/?tag=barack-obama for more Obama DADT & DOMA goodness (with "America's Pastor' thrown in for good measure).
Still want to argue? Take it up with history.