Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(52,299 posts)

4. Thank you. I was wondering about what would happen had it declined to take it

Tue Dec 12, 2023, 12:22 PM

Dec 2023

I would like to think that even this court would understand the importance of a quick decision. At least Roberts and the non-Thoma non-Alito ones.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Options For The Supreme Court re: Jack Smith's Request [View all] gab13by13 Dec 2023 OP

They've already agreed to fast-track it. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #1

Occam's Razor, gab13by13 Dec 2023 #5

Bypass or backstop, similar effect. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2023 #6

If the SC rules that Trump has total immunity Fichefinder Dec 2023 #3

Thank you. I was wondering about what would happen had it declined to take it question everything Dec 2023 #4