General Discussion

Think. Again.

(22,456 posts)

65. The article is clearly about...

Reply to stopdiggin (Reply #42)

Wed Dec 13, 2023, 05:02 PM

Dec 2023

...pro-Palestinian demonstrators who did not call for the genocide of Jews.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Emrys Emrys

92 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Message auto-removed [View all] Name removed Dec 2023 OP

And their definition of "Justice for Palestine?" Eliminating of Israel question everything Dec 2023 #1

That would be your assumption of their definition... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #7

Did you ever think "Justice for Palestine" means "Please stop murdering us"? Maraya1969 Dec 2023 #50

No, it should have meant, in 2005, that Gazans had their chance to establish their own question everything Dec 2023 #68

It's interesting that they steal humanitarian aid on top of the cash from Israel redqueen Dec 2023 #72

Your claim is just not true. It is a fairy tale which continues to dehumanize Palestinians. Big Blue Marble Dec 2023 #90

These poor "Bullied" groups Got Suspended at Rutgers.. Cha Dec 2023 #63

B.S. Sky Jewels Dec 2023 #66

Yet the adore the far more regressive murderous, rapist, hyper theocrats? TheKentuckian Dec 2023 #70

Yeah, no. Sky Jewels Dec 2023 #78

I bet it is even billions of people through out the world. Big Blue Marble Dec 2023 #92

Sloppy rerun of McCarthyism won't shut people up. David__77 Dec 2023 #2

Bingo! Nicely put. Basic LA Dec 2023 #3

THIS malaise Dec 2023 #18

Indeed, in fact it will have the opposite effect. nt redqueen Dec 2023 #23

Wherein we've found the limits victimhood Sympthsical Dec 2023 #4

As the article clearly states... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #8

I actively reject the article's premise and selectivity Sympthsical Dec 2023 #10

You may be projecting. Think. Again. Dec 2023 #11

The article cites an AP article from October as evidence Sympthsical Dec 2023 #16

Your post that I am responding to was pretending... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #24

You're attempting a bait and switch Sympthsical Dec 2023 #29

The title of the OP... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #32

This is game playing Sympthsical Dec 2023 #37

Nailed it 🎯 Arazi Dec 2023 #26

And "civil disobedience" brings with it the idea that 1) you're breaking the law and 2) you'll be arrested. brooklynite Dec 2023 #81

and trespassing - after and against verbal warning stopdiggin Dec 2023 #17

the AP has 'discredited' in one particular incidence stopdiggin Dec 2023 #21

I agree... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #27

Would it be ok sarisataka Dec 2023 #5

No, it's ok for them to Harass Jewish Students and Teachers Cha Dec 2023 #13

It is very apparent that is true sarisataka Dec 2023 #25

Who is bullying them? Takket Dec 2023 #6

That seems true... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #9

Would this be bullying? Chakaconcarne Dec 2023 #12

no it would not. 'protest' has never provided immunity from sanctions stopdiggin Dec 2023 #15

The article makes a solid point in that free speech is a fundamental stopdiggin Dec 2023 #14

Thank you for clarifying... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #30

not really. the article is really aimed at the congressional hearing stopdiggin Dec 2023 #42

The article is clearly about... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #65

in one particular incidence stopdiggin Dec 2023 #85

Are you trying to imply... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #87

I'm not trying to IMPLY anything stopdiggin Dec 2023 #89

Some try to falsely paint almost any pushback against Israel's actions as antisemitic and/or pro Hamas. #facts Celerity Dec 2023 #45

I certainly haven't seen any lack of 'debate' (or opinion) on this subject stopdiggin Dec 2023 #88

"From the river to the sea" is a call for genocide. egduj Dec 2023 #19

Nonsense. David__77 Dec 2023 #20

Thank you for educating me, but could you be a little more precise? egduj Dec 2023 #22

If you really want to understand - it has definitely taken on a meaning that some believe means the elimination of Nanjeanne Dec 2023 #35

So Jews are over-reacting, too thin-skinned, and it's an "only words" type of thing? egduj Dec 2023 #41

Who said that? Did someone use the words thin-skinned. Over reacting? You are making something up Nanjeanne Dec 2023 #44

that is OTT projection, a blatant attempt to universalise a smear against anything you disagree with in regards to P/I Celerity Dec 2023 #49

The aims are exactly the same. Wipe out the Jews and TheKentuckian Dec 2023 #74

Absolutely ridiculous, legitimate criticism over such things as disproportionate response is not the same as Celerity Dec 2023 #82

Are we there yet? OilemFirchen Dec 2023 #43

well written (as well as long winded) stopdiggin Dec 2023 #56

If I concede your point then it holds true for Israel saying no Palestinian state deserves to exist as well Nanjeanne Dec 2023 #59

Nonsense. emulatorloo Dec 2023 #33

Like "Between the sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty"? muriel_volestrangler Dec 2023 #36

And recently tweeted my the Minister of Communications redqueen Dec 2023 #39

Was it a call for genocide when it was first used by Israeli Zionists? Celerity Dec 2023 #54

Is it also a call for genocide when used by rightwing Israeli politicians? Voltaire2 Dec 2023 #83

I say let the Hamas supporters bray all they want. BlueTsunami2018 Dec 2023 #28

This OP is not about... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #31

Of course they're not mentioned. OilemFirchen Dec 2023 #38

I don't see anywhere Eko Dec 2023 #46

Huh? OilemFirchen Dec 2023 #48

Then to clairify Eko Dec 2023 #51

No. To ACTUALLY clarify... OilemFirchen Dec 2023 #53

Really? Eko Dec 2023 #57

You seem to be... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #64

I'll speak for myself, thank you. OilemFirchen Dec 2023 #71

Lol. "Hamas supporters." Nice try! Sky Jewels Dec 2023 #67

If it walks like a duck..... BlueTsunami2018 Dec 2023 #75

Do you have any idea how racist that is? Think. Again. Dec 2023 #77

I think a simple standard should be applied BannonsLiver Dec 2023 #34

I agree Eko Dec 2023 #47

I'm glad we're on the same page. BannonsLiver Dec 2023 #62

A most predictable opinion from Jeffery Sachs. madaboutharry Dec 2023 #40

I will not support the government working to ban peaceful protest based upon ideology, any ideology. Chainfire Dec 2023 #52

And it will - the groundwork has already started redqueen Dec 2023 #55

Jeffrey Sachs is a putin apologist who has Tomconroy Dec 2023 #58

NYTimes ran a similar piece today "Campus Speech Codes Should Be Abolished" LymphocyteLover Dec 2023 #60

These poor Fucking "Bullied" Groups Got Suspended Cha Dec 2023 #61

These soft ass chumps don't know what being bullied even is TheKentuckian Dec 2023 #69

They seem to be whiny fucks. nt LexVegas Dec 2023 #73

Fuck Stefanik and her fucking supporters. Autumn Dec 2023 #76

I agree! David__77 Dec 2023 #80

This. Voltaire2 Dec 2023 #84

The phrase "Bullying, " RIP...here it lies next to its cousin, "Trauma" Prairie Gates Dec 2023 #79

"Bullying" ... LOL. Boo-hoo. 😢😥😂 Oopsie Daisy Dec 2023 #86

Bullying? Bullshit. Let me tune my violin, it's the tiniest in the world. Jedi Guy Dec 2023 #91