Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

H2O Man

(79,238 posts)
Wed Dec 13, 2023, 10:23 PM Dec 2023

Mr. Smith [View all]

"We have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everyone." -- Jack Smith

I remember when Mr. Smith was appointed to his current position. A number of the DU community members asked "who?" and "why?" The few of us who were already familiar with him attempted to assure others that this was a great choice, exactly the person our country needed in that position.

Smith's filing with the U.S. Supreme Court per the defendent is evidence of that. I do understand why some community members do not trust the majority of the justices. We remember them selecting the loser of the 2000 election to serve as president. We are all aware of the christian zealots on the court, who overturned Roe. No matter how corrupt and disgusting you may think some of them to be, be aware that I think they are far worse than you do.

Malaise and I would often discuss the federal courts during the defendent's presidency. Especially in late 2020, when the defendent was attempting to get various courts to go along with the Big Lie. Our favorite phrase was "the institutions will hold." And they did.

As noted on The Last Word, the defendent's legal team wants to stretch pre-trial events out as long as possible. They definitely hope the case isn't heard until after next November. Yet their filings speak of the pain and suffering the case is causing the defendent, which suggests they want it to end. How can they oppose Mr. Smith's request that the USSC hear this part of the case immediately?

This is historic. There is zero chance the high court will rule in favor of the defendent. The claim, for example, that because he was impeached, it is double jeopardy does not reach the intellectual level of a seventh grade debate. The defendent's plan to delay, delay, delay did not anticipate Jack Smith.

This move by Mr. Smith should be noted in future history books as being among the most important factors in convicting the defendent, and preventing him from "winning" the 2024 presidential election. An example of the institutions holding. Yet there is another institution that will play an essential role here, and that is comprised of the voting public. We have a job to do, that includes but is not limited to voting. We need to put forth our best efforts to win elections for Democratic Party candidates at all levels.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mr. Smith [View all] H2O Man Dec 2023 OP
Yes, yes, yes! Thank you, my dear H20 Man. CaliforniaPeggy Dec 2023 #1
Thank you. H2O Man Dec 2023 #11
THIS malaise Dec 2023 #19
Thanks for this encouragement Easterncedar Dec 2023 #2
And thank you! H2O Man Dec 2023 #13
The winner is the one standing when the bell rings. jaxexpat Dec 2023 #25
Mr. Smith is a bad ass. paleotn Dec 2023 #3
I agree. H2O Man Dec 2023 #14
With this SCOTUS hurple Dec 2023 #4
100% H2O Man Dec 2023 #10
Why would they do this? malthaussen Dec 2023 #24
Well... hurple Dec 2023 #28
The Congress critters are politicians. malthaussen Dec 2023 #33
When I hear about justice delayed... SleeplessinSoCal Dec 2023 #5
Glad Mr. Smith is on the hunt and with a plan. PufPuf23 Dec 2023 #6
K&R Blue Owl Dec 2023 #7
K&R spanone Dec 2023 #8
K & R Ohio Joe Dec 2023 #9
I am damn glad this Mr. Smith went to Washington...... lastlib Dec 2023 #12
I love the legal strategy of it all.. cilla4progress Dec 2023 #15
From your lips to God's ears, H2O Man Hekate Dec 2023 #16
I don't trust the current USSC to honor precedent, but... Martin Eden Dec 2023 #17
A fabulous OP malaise Dec 2023 #18
TY H2 - read your OP and actually enjoying my coffee vs the usual fuming. NoMoreRepugs Dec 2023 #20
KnR...nt MiHale Dec 2023 #21
Well, that was a reassuring way to start my day. Thanks for the reminder that there are reasons KPN Dec 2023 #22
I have no fear of the USSC in this case. malthaussen Dec 2023 #23
I certainly hope that you are right Bundbuster Dec 2023 #26
Thanks for this; so much. twodogsbarking Dec 2023 #27
Let's keep Biden and Harris in the White House and win the senate and house (and all down the line!) usonian Dec 2023 #29
From now on I am always calling him "the defendant ". LakeArenal Dec 2023 #30
Thank you for your well-informed, calm discussion Wild blueberry Dec 2023 #31
He's being very agressive Saoirse9 Dec 2023 #32
At the risk of being accused of excessive pedantry, there's something I feel compelled to point out. ShazzieB Dec 2023 #34
Thanks for this. ShazzieB Dec 2023 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mr. Smith