If Anonymous has definitive proof that Rove tried to hack the vote, present it.

[reusrename]

368. yes, peer review is necessary - can't image it taking more than another month or two

But the 10%, it's documented history, recorded in the official certified vote totals.

The vote totals themselves are impossible. They cannot occur naturally. Only electronic vote flipping can produce such outcomes.

There is no smoke, no mirrors. The certified results themselves, are either a miracle, or they were flipped electronically.

Here's why.

1) In order to intentionally produce these results using your theory, each individual precinct would first have to be ordered by size. Not the size of the precinct, but the actual vote, which means that voter turnout for each precinct would have to be accurately determined in advance.

2) Then, the actual vote counts in each precinct would have to be accurately predicted.

3) Now the impossible part, expenditures would have to be assigned on a precinct-by-precinct basis in such a manner that it suppressed or enhanced the vote in each individual precinct such that it outperformed its next smaller neighbor while still managing to underperform its next larger neighbor.

How do you think that last part was done? Because it did happen in the certified vote. Fact.

I think a rational person would concede that it could only happen by electronic vote flipping. There is no other possible explanation.