Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Johonny

(26,149 posts)

19. You under estimate of the court to make

Reply to getagrip_already (Reply #18)

Tue Dec 19, 2023, 09:56 PM

Dec 2023

Hilarious limited rulings.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So what if tfg cant be on the ballot? [View all] getagrip_already Dec 2023 OP

Colorado thing is about Primary ballot... WarGamer Dec 2023 #1

Not about primary ballot at all.... getagrip_already Dec 2023 #7

Constitution enid602 Dec 2023 #29

But there's no CONVICTION... yet. WarGamer Dec 2023 #37

That will never happen Fiendish Thingy Dec 2023 #2

Dont be so sure..... getagrip_already Dec 2023 #10

To allow the ruling to stand would nullify due process. Fiendish Thingy Dec 2023 #17

There is no such requirement in the 14th amendment.... getagrip_already Dec 2023 #21

If all it takes is convincing a judge, Biden will be disqualified Fiendish Thingy Dec 2023 #23

There's no argument to be made that Biden was involved in an insurrection. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #25

Exactly- which is why SCOTUS will overturn the CO ruling Fiendish Thingy Dec 2023 #27

This isn't a criminal trial. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #24

The clear Bludogdem Dec 2023 #32

Mostly false. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #34

Of course not being on the ballot doesn't mean they can't write in Raven123 Dec 2023 #3

Its not just the ballot, he cant serve..... getagrip_already Dec 2023 #6

The ruling says write-in votes won't be counted. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #8

Thanks for that information. Didn't see it Raven123 Dec 2023 #12

Even if he is not on the ballot he will claim he won rurallib Dec 2023 #4

pretty sure this is meant as satire stopdiggin Dec 2023 #5

I'm not sure how any of that makes any sense. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #9

If he cant be on the ballot, than who is? getagrip_already Dec 2023 #13

Not sure I understand your point. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #20

Party primaries are not really electoral processes... getagrip_already Dec 2023 #28

On the GOP side, that's mostly false. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #31

Hmmm, beddy intewestink....... getagrip_already Dec 2023 #35

Ironically, they passed the rules to protect Trump. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #36

What happens is many more states that can swing it will have their own SC declare that MOMFUDSKI Dec 2023 #11

Right duckworth969 Dec 2023 #15

They may not have that option. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #22

A better option is if any state declares he can be on the ballot getagrip_already Dec 2023 #16

I think he will be on enough ballots country wise Johonny Dec 2023 #14

Scotus will have to rule and settle the issue getagrip_already Dec 2023 #18

You under estimate of the court to make Johonny Dec 2023 #19

I think he will be on enough to still win the nomination. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #26

He is also off the general election ballot.... getagrip_already Dec 2023 #30

Agree that they have to take up the case. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #33