Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NYC Liberal

(20,456 posts)
7. Nail on the head.
Tue Dec 26, 2023, 02:55 PM
Dec 2023

Yes, their decisions may align with his politics because, well, they are conservative, but I haven't seen any indication that they are loyal to or inclined to help him personally. They did nothing to help him overturn the election in 2020.

TFG would go full-on dictator and try in some way to control or even eliminate them


This is precisely why I think they will rule against him.

I think the worst case scenario is, depending on when they rule, they may punt it and say a conviction is required. But that brings up a whole new potential crisis, which is that he is convicted between election day and inauguration. Or he's sworn in while the jury is still deliberating and is convicted after taking office (an unlikely but possible scenario where he couldn't withdraw the case when he's president again). Not necessarily a constitutional crisis because the 20th Amendment covers a president-elect being disqualified, but still would not be good for the country.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Conundrum': SCOTUS cons...»Reply #7