Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(82,849 posts)

11. That's my take on it

Tue Dec 26, 2023, 03:50 PM

Dec 2023

They'll just figure out what their desired outcome is, then reverse-engineer some "legal" "reasoning" to support that outcome.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ROFL!!!! 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2023 #1

"Go home to Satan, son of a bitch" dalton99a Dec 2023 #2

I think that's a false conundrum. SCOTUS doesn't have to choose TFG; Ocelot II Dec 2023 #3

Nail on the head. NYC Liberal Dec 2023 #7

Exactly. They owe Donnie the Orange nothing really. paleotn Dec 2023 #8

Hard agree. ShazzieB Dec 2023 #12

I agree this is a false conundrum. barbtries Dec 2023 #16

Fun to watch MOMFUDSKI Dec 2023 #4

We Had The Same Discussion Here... ProfessorGAC Dec 2023 #6

...while Alito is busily poring over the Code of Hammurabi Buns_of_Fire Dec 2023 #9

That's my take on it gratuitous Dec 2023 #11

K&R 2naSalit Dec 2023 #10