Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,621 posts)
7. I take it to mean parallel conclusions.
Fri Dec 29, 2023, 01:33 AM
Dec 2023

In the '60s a Canadian linguist claimed that language learners don't just go from "not fluent" to "fluent," but become fluent by topic and context. You can be good in colloquial, every day language, but not able to discuss turbines or accounting--or be good at those but pointless when it comes to computers or art.

That was his thesis; spun off monographs, articles, he was cited widely for his insightful ideas.

Sadly, his ideas were exactly those of some in the Prague Linguistics Circle from the 1920s and '30s, which he didn't cite at least once nor gave any evidence of knowing about. Why should he? Their publications were in a variety of languages--French, Czech, Russian, German. They all knew all four, so it didn't matter; but unless you know all four, it's not a cohesive body of work.

Oh, and he didn't use their words the exact same categories.

He re-invented the wheel.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Expert shocked as Trump a...»Reply #7