Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(53,291 posts)
15. I was thinking of something a little more succinct
Sat Dec 30, 2023, 07:34 PM
Dec 2023

1. Many government officials, including presidents, enjoy a grant of immunity against prosecution for official acts performed as part of their duties of office. This Court welcomes this grant.

2. As an example, President Obama, a member of the Democratic Party, directed Naval Special Warfare Development Group, an organization popularly referred to as "SEAL Team 6," to locate and kill Osama bin Laden, who served as the leader of the Al Qaeda terror group. Even if the Republican Party disagreed with his having done this, he would not be liable for prosecution for having done it because the killing of Mr. bin Laden - who engineered the deaths of over 3000 Americans on September 11, 2001 - is considered to be an act in the national interest of the United States.

3. The defendant in this case has filed numerous briefs requesting that the charges currently against him be dismissed because he was President of the United States when he allegedly performed them.

4. This Court cannot imagine that even in some off-label fantasy comic book the acts the Defendant is accused of, which include attempting to overturn an election that he lost using many tactics including having the Capitol Building invaded by an armed mob, would ever be considered an official duty of a United States President.

5. This Court prays that the Defendant's requests be denied and that the trials against him proceed as scheduled.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This brief is aimed at the SCOTUS LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #1
Because of things like this, I think SCotUS will decline to Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2023 #18
That's what I think, too. ShazzieB Dec 2023 #28
Their reponse filings are always eloquent and to the point, which I appreciate except for my hlthe2b Dec 2023 #2
I wonder if that's how they start out and then translate it to legalese mcar Dec 2023 #8
I can imagine Jack and his team doing just that in private MadameButterfly Dec 2023 #20
TY You and Jack Smith! Cha Dec 2023 #3
When was his response due? ecstatic Dec 2023 #4
It was due today. And Trump gets to file a reply, due on Jan 2. onenote Dec 2023 #11
This brief was due by midnight LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #13
Very professional. Not once did he mention that TFG stinks. Sneederbunk Dec 2023 #5
The majority of Americans are already overwhelmed by the foul odor of Trump's position ... nt Jarqui Dec 2023 #9
That's an implied stipulation JoseBalow Dec 2023 #17
I'm sure they take, um, "judicial notice"......... lastlib Dec 2023 #19
What an amazing and courageous man, and staff. Boomerproud Dec 2023 #6
Article I, Section 3, last paragraph... Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #7
Trump isn't arguing an exception for the president. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #23
Yes, traitortrump's argument is absurd Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #26
Good analysis! Plus, the only reason Trump was not convicted in the Senate was because of the cowardly, LaMouffette Dec 2023 #29
Great news malaise Dec 2023 #10
Just a thought - MOMFUDSKI Dec 2023 #12
I sure hope so. Abigail_Adams Dec 2023 #30
This brief addresses the extreme danger of giving any POTUS the type of immunity sought by TFG LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #14
I was thinking of something a little more succinct jmowreader Dec 2023 #15
Nope. This thing is likely to go to SCOTUS, and they had to tee up an argument Ocelot II Dec 2023 #27
i cannot even believe how much time and money is being wasted on litigating this Takket Dec 2023 #16
The great American justice system at work. triron Dec 2023 #21
K&R spanone Dec 2023 #22
Excellent, and very thorough, brief. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #24
This SHOULD be a "no brainer", but this is USA! USA! USA! TeamProg Dec 2023 #25
Response Brief is brilliant Wild blueberry Dec 2023 #31
New Jack Smith court filing dismantles Trump's claim that he should be above our nation's laws LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Special Counsel Jack Smit...»Reply #15