Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

lastlib

(28,420 posts)

19. I'm sure they take, um, "judicial notice".........

Reply to Sneederbunk (Reply #5)

Sat Dec 30, 2023, 08:23 PM

Dec 2023

They can't help but notice......

I'm having a new-found sympathy for Nancy Pelosi having to sit behind him at SOTU............

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

flying_wahini

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Special Counsel Jack Smith has filed Response Brief on the immunity issue [View all] LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 OP

This brief is aimed at the SCOTUS LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #1

Because of things like this, I think SCotUS will decline to Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2023 #18

That's what I think, too. ShazzieB Dec 2023 #28

Their reponse filings are always eloquent and to the point, which I appreciate except for my hlthe2b Dec 2023 #2

I wonder if that's how they start out and then translate it to legalese mcar Dec 2023 #8

I can imagine Jack and his team doing just that in private MadameButterfly Dec 2023 #20

TY You and Jack Smith! Cha Dec 2023 #3

When was his response due? ecstatic Dec 2023 #4

It was due today. And Trump gets to file a reply, due on Jan 2. onenote Dec 2023 #11

This brief was due by midnight LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #13

Very professional. Not once did he mention that TFG stinks. Sneederbunk Dec 2023 #5

The majority of Americans are already overwhelmed by the foul odor of Trump's position ... nt Jarqui Dec 2023 #9

That's an implied stipulation JoseBalow Dec 2023 #17

I'm sure they take, um, "judicial notice"......... lastlib Dec 2023 #19

What an amazing and courageous man, and staff. Boomerproud Dec 2023 #6

Article I, Section 3, last paragraph... Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #7

Trump isn't arguing an exception for the president. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #23

Yes, traitortrump's argument is absurd Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #26

Good analysis! Plus, the only reason Trump was not convicted in the Senate was because of the cowardly, LaMouffette Dec 2023 #29

Great news malaise Dec 2023 #10

Just a thought - MOMFUDSKI Dec 2023 #12

I sure hope so. Abigail_Adams Dec 2023 #30

This brief addresses the extreme danger of giving any POTUS the type of immunity sought by TFG LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #14

I was thinking of something a little more succinct jmowreader Dec 2023 #15

Nope. This thing is likely to go to SCOTUS, and they had to tee up an argument Ocelot II Dec 2023 #27

i cannot even believe how much time and money is being wasted on litigating this Takket Dec 2023 #16

The great American justice system at work. triron Dec 2023 #21

K&R spanone Dec 2023 #22

Excellent, and very thorough, brief. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #24

This SHOULD be a "no brainer", but this is USA! USA! USA! TeamProg Dec 2023 #25

Response Brief is brilliant Wild blueberry Dec 2023 #31

New Jack Smith court filing dismantles Trump's claim that he should be above our nation's laws LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #32