Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LaMouffette

(2,648 posts)

29. Good analysis! Plus, the only reason Trump was not convicted in the Senate was because of the cowardly,

Reply to Ms. Toad (Reply #23)

Sun Dec 31, 2023, 10:30 AM

Dec 2023

self-serving Repube senators who could not find within themselves a shred of moral integrity to do the right thing and vote to convict him on the impeachment charges. Those senators were the furthest thing imaginable from being impartial in their judgment of Trump.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

flying_wahini

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Special Counsel Jack Smith has filed Response Brief on the immunity issue [View all] LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 OP

This brief is aimed at the SCOTUS LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #1

Because of things like this, I think SCotUS will decline to Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2023 #18

That's what I think, too. ShazzieB Dec 2023 #28

Their reponse filings are always eloquent and to the point, which I appreciate except for my hlthe2b Dec 2023 #2

I wonder if that's how they start out and then translate it to legalese mcar Dec 2023 #8

I can imagine Jack and his team doing just that in private MadameButterfly Dec 2023 #20

TY You and Jack Smith! Cha Dec 2023 #3

When was his response due? ecstatic Dec 2023 #4

It was due today. And Trump gets to file a reply, due on Jan 2. onenote Dec 2023 #11

This brief was due by midnight LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #13

Very professional. Not once did he mention that TFG stinks. Sneederbunk Dec 2023 #5

The majority of Americans are already overwhelmed by the foul odor of Trump's position ... nt Jarqui Dec 2023 #9

That's an implied stipulation JoseBalow Dec 2023 #17

I'm sure they take, um, "judicial notice"......... lastlib Dec 2023 #19

What an amazing and courageous man, and staff. Boomerproud Dec 2023 #6

Article I, Section 3, last paragraph... Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #7

Trump isn't arguing an exception for the president. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #23

Yes, traitortrump's argument is absurd Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #26

Good analysis! Plus, the only reason Trump was not convicted in the Senate was because of the cowardly, LaMouffette Dec 2023 #29

Great news malaise Dec 2023 #10

Just a thought - MOMFUDSKI Dec 2023 #12

I sure hope so. Abigail_Adams Dec 2023 #30

This brief addresses the extreme danger of giving any POTUS the type of immunity sought by TFG LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #14

I was thinking of something a little more succinct jmowreader Dec 2023 #15

Nope. This thing is likely to go to SCOTUS, and they had to tee up an argument Ocelot II Dec 2023 #27

i cannot even believe how much time and money is being wasted on litigating this Takket Dec 2023 #16

The great American justice system at work. triron Dec 2023 #21

K&R spanone Dec 2023 #22

Excellent, and very thorough, brief. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #24

This SHOULD be a "no brainer", but this is USA! USA! USA! TeamProg Dec 2023 #25

Response Brief is brilliant Wild blueberry Dec 2023 #31

New Jack Smith court filing dismantles Trump's claim that he should be above our nation's laws LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #32