Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Judges warn Trump lawyers 'discrete issues' need to be discussed in immunity claim [View all]
There have been some interesting amicus briefs filed that raise some issue that TFG may not want to deal with. The Jan. 9 hearing is going to be fun to listen to.
Link to tweet
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-2666851559/
The judges tasked with ruling on Donald Trumps immunity claims have warned both the former president and special counsel Jack Smith to be prepared to discuss discrete issues raised in past filings, court records show.
The U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit Tuesday told lawyers on both teams they should be ready by Jan. 9 to present oral arguments on issues raised in amicus briefs, or information provided by supporting groups.
While it remains unclear what those discrete issues may be, amicus briefs have come in from high-ranking Republicans, attorneys who served in Trump's White House and even a legal watchdog group challenging the D.C. Circuit court's jurisdiction to rule on presidential immunity at all.
In mid-December, a group of Republican lawmakers including Deputy Attorney General Donald Ayer and former Justice Department official Barbara Comstock filed an amicus brief backing Smiths claim that there is no legal precedent for blanket presidential immunity.
The U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit Tuesday told lawyers on both teams they should be ready by Jan. 9 to present oral arguments on issues raised in amicus briefs, or information provided by supporting groups.
While it remains unclear what those discrete issues may be, amicus briefs have come in from high-ranking Republicans, attorneys who served in Trump's White House and even a legal watchdog group challenging the D.C. Circuit court's jurisdiction to rule on presidential immunity at all.
In mid-December, a group of Republican lawmakers including Deputy Attorney General Donald Ayer and former Justice Department official Barbara Comstock filed an amicus brief backing Smiths claim that there is no legal precedent for blanket presidential immunity.
25 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judges warn Trump lawyers 'discrete issues' need to be discussed in immunity claim [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Jan 2024
OP
"discrete" rather than "discreet", which I interpret to mean limited by boundaries nt
spooky3
Jan 2024
#4
Those "discrete issues" include the argument that Smith's appointment as Special Counsel was "ultra vires"
onenote
Jan 2024
#5
I didn't know Ed Meese was still alive. I thought he became worm shit decades ago..
Stinky The Clown
Jan 2024
#7
TFG and the DOJ must answer questions during oral arguments on 1/9 about issues raised in the amicus curiae briefs
LetMyPeopleVote
Jan 2024
#9
Lawyers' Amicus Brief Adds New Wrinkle to Donald Trump's Immunity Appeal
LetMyPeopleVote
Jan 2024
#10