General Discussion

CountAllVotes

(22,218 posts)

44. K&R

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Sun Jan 7, 2024, 12:06 PM

Jan 2024

LOCK TFG up NOW!

Dangerous freak on the loose!

& recommend.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Congress has already determined, as a matter of law, that the Jan 6 Capitol attack was an insurrection. [View all] pnwmom Jan 2024 OP

K&R 2naSalit Jan 2024 #1

Kick dalton99a Jan 2024 #2

Gold. Gold! bucolic_frolic Jan 2024 #3

And some came with intent to kill. GreenWave Jan 2024 #4

All of them did or at least were okay with it including that dim wit ashley babbit! PortTack Jan 2024 #15

Vote was -- Yea 406 -- Nay 21 -- Not Voting 4 LiberalFighter Jan 2024 #5

And there's a few on that list that voted nay to protect their own insurrectionist bottoms. canuckledragger Jan 2024 #7

The pardon requesters dpibel Jan 2024 #8

I'm surprised Jordan isn't on that list. ShazzieB Jan 2024 #14

kick. AllaN01Bear Jan 2024 #6

Rebellion OR Insurrection are the terms used in the Constitution. live love laugh Jan 2024 #9

Kicked! love_katz Jan 2024 #10

And 2 proud boy leaders were convicted of insurrection Kablooie Jan 2024 #11

I believe it was Seditious Conspiracy Zeitghost Jan 2024 #27

The targets of the insurrection knew it was an insurrection. Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2024 #12

And in a bipartisan conclusion said BaronChocula Jan 2024 #13

Just +++++++++++++++++++++. Attention: Jack Smith!! KPN Jan 2024 #16

The U.S. Corrupt Court will laugh at what elected legislators do Mysterian Jan 2024 #17

Ahem, people being hurt/dying does not make it an insurrection Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2024 #18

That's NOT what I said. Congress made a legal FINDING that the attack was carried out by pnwmom Jan 2024 #19

Okay, I looked at it all, but not carefully enough. Thanks for highlighting that. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2024 #20

True. But in spirit, at least, this law connects to 18 U.S. CODE � 2383 - REBELLION OR INSURRECTION. ancianita Jan 2024 #21

Right -- which is why some of the insurrectionists were convicted of the crime of insurrection. nt pnwmom Jan 2024 #22

Cool. I'm not sure I read about that in justice.gov but I'll take your word for it. ancianita Jan 2024 #23

I misspoke. It was sedition -- or seditious conspiracy -- that was the most serious charge. pnwmom Jan 2024 #24

Thanks. More accurate. And it still falls under the insurrection law on the books as 18 U.S. CODE � 2383. ancianita Jan 2024 #26

Thanks for pulling all this together! nt pnwmom Jan 2024 #28

I don't believe anyone has been charged Zeitghost Jan 2024 #29

You're right. Read post #24 and its follow-ups for more on this. nt pnwmom Jan 2024 #30

Ahh Zeitghost Jan 2024 #31

You're right. Just conspiracy and other 18 USC crimes that are more important. ancianita Jan 2024 #32

. TomDaisy Jan 2024 #33

K&R n/t Alice Kramden Jan 2024 #25

Where in the test does it say "insurrection"? rwild1967 Jan 2024 #34

The relevant passage is under FINDINGS: pnwmom Jan 2024 #35

A great OP malaise Jan 2024 #36

now if only we can get that through the dodo heads of those still in congress SouthernDem4ever Jan 2024 #37

Sorry, but statutory "Findings" do not have the force of law. onenote Jan 2024 #38

The Republicans who voted against it thought it did. pnwmom Jan 2024 #40

Meaningless. onenote Jan 2024 #42

Where did I use the word "force"? The word "insurrectionist" is literally in the findings pnwmom Jan 2024 #43

Let's be clear: no competent prosecutor would argue that the finding in the medals statute onenote Jan 2024 #45

Well lookie here! Susan Calvin Jan 2024 #39

Worst. Tourists. Ever. BobTheSubgenius Jan 2024 #41

K&R CountAllVotes Jan 2024 #44

Bet the supreme court changes it. republianmushroom Jan 2024 #46