Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lostnfound

(17,652 posts)
32. Our Pentagon assets are hotter and smarter than your Pentagon assets
Wed Jan 10, 2024, 08:57 AM
Jan 2024

Last edited Wed Jan 10, 2024, 09:52 AM - Edit history (3)

While considering this smartass answer I looked for Reagan Pentagon assets which led me to a Wikipedia page that needs attention and rewrite. This is the lame description of the Iran-Contra fiasco on the ‘Reagan Doctrine’ Wikipedia page:

Iran–Contra affair
U.S. funding for the Contras, who opposed the Sandinista government of Nicaragua, was obtained from covert sources. The U.S. Congress did not authorize sufficient funds for the Contras' efforts, and the Boland Amendment barred further funding. In 1986, in an episode that became known as The Iran–Contra affair, the Reagan administration illegally facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, the subject of an arms embargo, in the hope that the arms sales would secure the release of hostages and allow U.S. intelligence agencies to fund the Nicaraguan Contras. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_Doctrine


This paragraph is phrased to minimize something that was a massive scandal at the time. “Obtained from covert sources”? Reagan was illegally arming both sides of a war to create a slush fund for the purpose of supporting Nicaraguan rebels in the hopes of overthrowing yet another democratically elected left-wing government.

M comments:
Iran–Contra affair
U.S. funding for (really, “Reagan’s funding of” since Congress had already passed a law against it) for the Contras, who opposed the Sandinista government of Nicaragua, was obtained (passive) from covert sources. The U.S. Congress did not authorize sufficient funds (oh, bad Congress for not giving “sufficient” funds…as judged by the plotters in Reagan’s circle?) for the Contras' efforts, and the Boland Amendment barred further funding. In 1986, in an episode (Reagan just had an ‘episode’ while Bill’s affair rises to the level of a ‘scandal’) that became known as The Iran–Contra affair, the Reagan administration illegally facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, the subject of an arms embargo, in the hope that the arms sales would secure the release of hostages was that really their main purpose or hope? An amnesiac public will carelessly link this to the Iranian hostages that ‘Reagan brought home’) and allow U.S. intelligence agencies to fund the Nicaraguan Contras.

Somebody ought to rewrite this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Taylor Swift is a "Pentagon asset" [View all] applegrove Jan 2024 OP
Taylor Swift has to travel with wound dressing because MontanaMama Jan 2024 #1
Distressing to hear. applegrove Jan 2024 #3
Taylor way out of bounds SarahD Jan 2024 #2
What happened to the GOP that loved the military? Nt spooky3 Jan 2024 #4
Their JesusGawd sees the military as suckers and so they do, too. Stinky The Clown Jan 2024 #6
The GI (Graven Image) disrespects GIs. Nt spooky3 Jan 2024 #15
military wouldn't roll over for Orange Jesus eShirl Jan 2024 #31
Is this their "low rent Tucker Carlson? Who himself was a "low rent Bill O'Reilly". Who himself was a "low rent....". nt Carlitos Brigante Jan 2024 #5
... "Bill O'Reilly". Who himself was a "low rent..." Dave Bowman Jan 2024 #7
I can't imagine anyone doing anything but laugh at that Warpy Jan 2024 #8
Thanks. I later found a Daily Beast Story too: applegrove Jan 2024 #10
Thanks for that - so it turns out it was a Trump DoD official who made it up, and co-indictee Jeffery Clark spread it muriel_volestrangler Jan 2024 #34
Boy, they sure focus on the critical issues.. Permanut Jan 2024 #9
Well they had to drop something "big" to counter the Trump applegrove Jan 2024 #11
That smell of desperation wafts through those Pox Noise airwaves... calimary Jan 2024 #14
Have they begun paying the judgment to Dominion yet? Seems spooky3 Jan 2024 #16
I don't know. Maybe they'll have to boost their ad rates calimary Jan 2024 #17
So now they oppose the Pentagon ??? DemocraticPatriot Jan 2024 #12
exactly my thought too Skittles Jan 2024 #13
And if they're against the pentagon, area51 Jan 2024 #35
Their hero Trump is a genuine Kremlin asset. n/t Mister Ed Jan 2024 #18
Ah, yes. Hence the dichotomy! dchill Jan 2024 #20
Jesse Watters is both Peter Principle and Dunning-Kruger with a mix of stone age stupid and Baghdad Bob. AZLD4Candidate Jan 2024 #19
He's also Portnoy's Complaint. dchill Jan 2024 #21
Never read it. Please elaborate for the ignorant of this topic please. I'd like to agree if I understood or knew AZLD4Candidate Jan 2024 #22
Google says: dchill Jan 2024 #23
The Multiplying 'Philip Roths' Celerity Jan 2024 #24
"I do not know," the essay concludes... dchill Jan 2024 #26
Well, he is a seedy and coarse jerkoff. So, you're right on all accounts, including the masturbation, being he is a AZLD4Candidate Jan 2024 #25
Poor Taylor Dorian Gray Jan 2024 #27
I concur. applegrove Jan 2024 #29
If her next album isn't titled "Girlboss Psyops" maxrandb Jan 2024 #28
The term 'girlboss' is so untrendy, out of date. Swift would never use it now. I would call it cheugy, but cheugy itself Celerity Jan 2024 #33
Dixie Chicks are proud of her! Emile Jan 2024 #30
Our Pentagon assets are hotter and smarter than your Pentagon assets lostnfound Jan 2024 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Taylor Swift is a "Pentag...»Reply #32