Israel is murdering Palestinian journalists in Gaza. Where is the outrage?

[Beastly Boy]

6. The implication is that what it is:

A number of journalists were complicit with terrorists. This disqualifies them from calling themselves journalists, or "protected people", as the Fourth Geneva Convention would put it. They made the choice.

The implication is that there is no "pattern of killing", as the article claims, for the Western media to address. Each is an individual case to be examined as such.

Of course, these implications are far too nuanced for some to consider, and jumping to outrageous conclusions regarding what I am implying is far easier and, probably, far more satisfactory.