Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

vanlassie

(6,245 posts)
21. I think Katie can do her best work in the House.
Sat Jan 13, 2024, 09:55 PM
Jan 2024

But I understand her wish to reduce the stress of campaigns. I’ve given her more money than any other candidate, ever, but I’m supporting Schiff for Senate.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am in favor of all of these proposals. CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2024 #1
I am too...I have been wondering for some time why no one seemed to try to tackle those issues, and Escurumbele Jan 2024 #19
Sinema and Manchin Tribetime Jan 2024 #26
Which of the other Democratic Senators has said they want to get rid of the filibuster? former9thward Jan 2024 #33
Several other Democrats weren't supporting end8nf the filibuster...they just stayed quiet. brooklynite Jan 2024 #56
Not for long mahina Jan 2024 #86
I too have been wondering that for a long long time!!!! DENVERPOPS Jan 2024 #42
I assume they mean the "procedural" filibuster and not the talking one. forgotmylogin Jan 2024 #93
Agree 100% kimbutgar Jan 2024 #2
Agree w/what Schiff said. area51 Jan 2024 #3
It needed to go a long time ago durablend Jan 2024 #4
I don't disagree with him... Red Mountain Jan 2024 #5
I support every bit of that. n/t CousinIT Jan 2024 #6
I like Schiff... but if he's elected in November... California has no women Senators. WarGamer Jan 2024 #7
Porter is excellent. Schiff is extraordinary. yorkster Jan 2024 #14
I'm voting for Porter. I think Schiff is a great legislator, but I think Porter would kick some GOP ass. ificandream Jan 2024 #15
I think Katie can do her best work in the House. vanlassie Jan 2024 #21
K&R spanone Jan 2024 #84
That is a good way to put it. Katie is good, but Adam is extraordinary. Hekate Jan 2024 #37
Same Rebl2 Jan 2024 #44
California had two female Senators for 24 years tinrobot Jan 2024 #28
It doesn't really make a difference, as long as someone is qualified Polybius Jan 2024 #80
And? Would it be better if CA had Marsha Blackburn as a Senator as she is a woman? nt kelly1mm Jan 2024 #98
Amendment 28 to the United States Constitution: Aristus Jan 2024 #8
MIght as well abolish 2A, same chances of happening. WarGamer Jan 2024 #9
Gotta at least try. COL Mustard Jan 2024 #20
Make people vote against one human one vote Nasruddin Jan 2024 #24
Actually, the odds are zero. SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #45
It is worse than that. Require 3/4 of the states to ratify. whopis01 Jan 2024 #59
It won't happen sadly. Demsrule86 Jan 2024 #100
team porter et tu Jan 2024 #73
Not really FBaggins Jan 2024 #77
Exactly. Some believe there are ways to neuter the EC without an Amendment. Silent Type Jan 2024 #50
Not neuter, but reduce the power of the EC in elections. Rafi Jan 2024 #102
I am with you... GiqueCee Jan 2024 #27
And we all know what a new Constitutional Amendment would require. oldsoftie Jan 2024 #39
It would make election day too boring Polybius Jan 2024 #47
A majority should be required. Voltaire2 Jan 2024 #103
I agree, but it's not realistic... surfered Jan 2024 #10
I truly think... GiqueCee Jan 2024 #31
And only one that's ever been repealed Polybius Jan 2024 #48
Expand the House, too Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2024 #11
Totally agree. However, would need a Democratic congress to accomplish, Fla Dem Jan 2024 #12
No and no TexasDem69 Jan 2024 #13
Supremes Nasruddin Jan 2024 #23
Removing lifetime appointment would require an amendment TexasDem69 Jan 2024 #38
That's correct SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #61
Maybe the Supreme Court doesn't get to decide what cases it hears Buckeyeblue Jan 2024 #106
will all due respect to Mr. Schiff, how does he plan on accomplishing that? Takket Jan 2024 #16
Killing the filibuster and expanding SCOTUS are doable, but not the EC Fiendish Thingy Jan 2024 #17
I agree with two out of three cabotnn22 Jan 2024 #18
Don't think so Nasruddin Jan 2024 #22
They would get used to it JustAnotherGen Jan 2024 #25
Hea, I'm in the Midwest, slightlv Jan 2024 #43
Good luck on the elector system. SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #29
Can't the states get rid of winner take all on their own? MichMan Jan 2024 #53
Yes they can SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #108
How is "winner take all" unconstitutional? whopis01 Jan 2024 #60
Yes. Biden would get 2 electoral votes from Indiana Captain Zero Jan 2024 #104
In the federalist papers SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #109
I believe the Federalist Papers makes a different argument whopis01 Jan 2024 #112
well briefly SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #113
K&R UTUSN Jan 2024 #30
We will need a super majority in the house and senate besides a dem president PortTack Jan 2024 #32
You need control SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #110
getting rid sabbat hunter Jan 2024 #34
To permanently and conclusively end it, yes. But an interstate pact would indefinitely end it ColinC Jan 2024 #36
But that is sabbat hunter Jan 2024 #40
Sure ColinC Jan 2024 #57
Unconstitutional SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #62
So ... we need an Act of Congress AND the success of the National Popular Voter Interstate Compact RandomNumbers Jan 2024 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #66
Yes, it would require both. SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #67
I don't believe they can enter into this compact SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #107
It's not a new pact because the rules are alreatf laid out in the constitution ColinC Jan 2024 #69
And that they may NOT enter into compacts with each other wthout the SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #71
Thing is they already pretty much do that ColinC Jan 2024 #74
See post 62. Compacts require congressional approval. tritsofme Jan 2024 #76
Yeah it isn't a compact that falls under that rule ColinC Jan 2024 #78
Then that makes it less than worthless. tritsofme Jan 2024 #79
I don't disagree that we need an amendment, but I think it would hold up a little better than you say ColinC Jan 2024 #81
Why though? Do really you think California would make Trump president? tritsofme Jan 2024 #82
Yes. Laws are laws and if wins based on the law then they have to ColinC Jan 2024 #87
Why couldn't a determined legislature change the law? If they so chose? tritsofme Jan 2024 #89
Of that were the case they would have done that a long time ago ColinC Jan 2024 #91
I don't know what that means. What would stop a determined legislature and governor from backing out? tritsofme Jan 2024 #92
It isn't a compact,it is state law. If the law requires they process the votes a certain way, they cannot go against it. ColinC Jan 2024 #94
They can change the law for the next election but not a past election. whopis01 Jan 2024 #105
Oooo ColinC Jan 2024 #35
If we don't do something like this montanacowboy Jan 2024 #41
It's good to get the ideas out there aka messaging. chowder66 Jan 2024 #46
All 3 have needed to be done for a long time Bayard Jan 2024 #49
Jim Crowe hold over needs to be in the history books, like the Confederate Flag. Bluethroughu Jan 2024 #51
" getting rid of the Electoral College, expanding the Supreme Court and eliminating the filibuster." Talitha Jan 2024 #52
Not having a filibuster Mountainguy Jan 2024 #54
Always a good idea when you're in the majority. Always a bad idea when you're in the minority. SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #63
K&R Blue Owl Jan 2024 #55
He can work to abolish the filibuster. He hasn't a chance of eliminating the Electoral College. brooklynite Jan 2024 #58
Prediction if the worst comes to pass FBaggins Jan 2024 #96
Voting to abolish the filibuster is a thing that can be done Bettie Jan 2024 #65
Love this candidate! ananda Jan 2024 #68
If Republicans take the Senate in 2024 former9thward Jan 2024 #70
Agree 100%. n/t Paper Roses Jan 2024 #72
Sounds good to me, I'm for it. Long past do. republianmushroom Jan 2024 #75
Hell Yes, his proposals are a great start. Magoo48 Jan 2024 #83
I don't agree with abolishing the filibuster, but it should be limited bucolic_frolic Jan 2024 #85
100%. I'm also a Katie Porter fan. mahina Jan 2024 #88
Unfortunately, some of his proposals aren't feasible short of changing the Constitution. LudwigPastorius Jan 2024 #90
Unfortunately BannonsLiver Jan 2024 #95
The Electoral College is a joke. sellitman Jan 2024 #97
His agenda is mine. jaxexpat Jan 2024 #99
The Court and Filibuster are doable quickly with a majority in congress. I believe it takes a Constitutional Amendment Rafi Jan 2024 #101
He is a gem. I will be donating to his campaign bc they have gone after him FlyingPiggy Jan 2024 #111
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Schiff would abolish fili...»Reply #21