Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SlimJimmy

(3,251 posts)
62. Unconstitutional
Sun Jan 14, 2024, 09:28 AM
Jan 2024
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/full-text

But an interstate pact would indefinitely end it

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am in favor of all of these proposals. CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2024 #1
I am too...I have been wondering for some time why no one seemed to try to tackle those issues, and Escurumbele Jan 2024 #19
Sinema and Manchin Tribetime Jan 2024 #26
Which of the other Democratic Senators has said they want to get rid of the filibuster? former9thward Jan 2024 #33
Several other Democrats weren't supporting end8nf the filibuster...they just stayed quiet. brooklynite Jan 2024 #56
Not for long mahina Jan 2024 #86
I too have been wondering that for a long long time!!!! DENVERPOPS Jan 2024 #42
I assume they mean the "procedural" filibuster and not the talking one. forgotmylogin Jan 2024 #93
Agree 100% kimbutgar Jan 2024 #2
Agree w/what Schiff said. area51 Jan 2024 #3
It needed to go a long time ago durablend Jan 2024 #4
I don't disagree with him... Red Mountain Jan 2024 #5
I support every bit of that. n/t CousinIT Jan 2024 #6
I like Schiff... but if he's elected in November... California has no women Senators. WarGamer Jan 2024 #7
Porter is excellent. Schiff is extraordinary. yorkster Jan 2024 #14
I'm voting for Porter. I think Schiff is a great legislator, but I think Porter would kick some GOP ass. ificandream Jan 2024 #15
I think Katie can do her best work in the House. vanlassie Jan 2024 #21
K&R spanone Jan 2024 #84
That is a good way to put it. Katie is good, but Adam is extraordinary. Hekate Jan 2024 #37
Same Rebl2 Jan 2024 #44
California had two female Senators for 24 years tinrobot Jan 2024 #28
It doesn't really make a difference, as long as someone is qualified Polybius Jan 2024 #80
And? Would it be better if CA had Marsha Blackburn as a Senator as she is a woman? nt kelly1mm Jan 2024 #98
Amendment 28 to the United States Constitution: Aristus Jan 2024 #8
MIght as well abolish 2A, same chances of happening. WarGamer Jan 2024 #9
Gotta at least try. COL Mustard Jan 2024 #20
Make people vote against one human one vote Nasruddin Jan 2024 #24
Actually, the odds are zero. SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #45
It is worse than that. Require 3/4 of the states to ratify. whopis01 Jan 2024 #59
It won't happen sadly. Demsrule86 Jan 2024 #100
team porter et tu Jan 2024 #73
Not really FBaggins Jan 2024 #77
Exactly. Some believe there are ways to neuter the EC without an Amendment. Silent Type Jan 2024 #50
Not neuter, but reduce the power of the EC in elections. Rafi Jan 2024 #102
I am with you... GiqueCee Jan 2024 #27
And we all know what a new Constitutional Amendment would require. oldsoftie Jan 2024 #39
It would make election day too boring Polybius Jan 2024 #47
A majority should be required. Voltaire2 Jan 2024 #103
I agree, but it's not realistic... surfered Jan 2024 #10
I truly think... GiqueCee Jan 2024 #31
And only one that's ever been repealed Polybius Jan 2024 #48
Expand the House, too Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2024 #11
Totally agree. However, would need a Democratic congress to accomplish, Fla Dem Jan 2024 #12
No and no TexasDem69 Jan 2024 #13
Supremes Nasruddin Jan 2024 #23
Removing lifetime appointment would require an amendment TexasDem69 Jan 2024 #38
That's correct SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #61
Maybe the Supreme Court doesn't get to decide what cases it hears Buckeyeblue Jan 2024 #106
will all due respect to Mr. Schiff, how does he plan on accomplishing that? Takket Jan 2024 #16
Killing the filibuster and expanding SCOTUS are doable, but not the EC Fiendish Thingy Jan 2024 #17
I agree with two out of three cabotnn22 Jan 2024 #18
Don't think so Nasruddin Jan 2024 #22
They would get used to it JustAnotherGen Jan 2024 #25
Hea, I'm in the Midwest, slightlv Jan 2024 #43
Good luck on the elector system. SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #29
Can't the states get rid of winner take all on their own? MichMan Jan 2024 #53
Yes they can SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #108
How is "winner take all" unconstitutional? whopis01 Jan 2024 #60
Yes. Biden would get 2 electoral votes from Indiana Captain Zero Jan 2024 #104
In the federalist papers SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #109
I believe the Federalist Papers makes a different argument whopis01 Jan 2024 #112
well briefly SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #113
K&R UTUSN Jan 2024 #30
We will need a super majority in the house and senate besides a dem president PortTack Jan 2024 #32
You need control SqueakyWheel.363 Jan 2024 #110
getting rid sabbat hunter Jan 2024 #34
To permanently and conclusively end it, yes. But an interstate pact would indefinitely end it ColinC Jan 2024 #36
But that is sabbat hunter Jan 2024 #40
Sure ColinC Jan 2024 #57
Unconstitutional SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #62
So ... we need an Act of Congress AND the success of the National Popular Voter Interstate Compact RandomNumbers Jan 2024 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #66
Yes, it would require both. SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #67
I don't believe they can enter into this compact SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #107
It's not a new pact because the rules are alreatf laid out in the constitution ColinC Jan 2024 #69
And that they may NOT enter into compacts with each other wthout the SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #71
Thing is they already pretty much do that ColinC Jan 2024 #74
See post 62. Compacts require congressional approval. tritsofme Jan 2024 #76
Yeah it isn't a compact that falls under that rule ColinC Jan 2024 #78
Then that makes it less than worthless. tritsofme Jan 2024 #79
I don't disagree that we need an amendment, but I think it would hold up a little better than you say ColinC Jan 2024 #81
Why though? Do really you think California would make Trump president? tritsofme Jan 2024 #82
Yes. Laws are laws and if wins based on the law then they have to ColinC Jan 2024 #87
Why couldn't a determined legislature change the law? If they so chose? tritsofme Jan 2024 #89
Of that were the case they would have done that a long time ago ColinC Jan 2024 #91
I don't know what that means. What would stop a determined legislature and governor from backing out? tritsofme Jan 2024 #92
It isn't a compact,it is state law. If the law requires they process the votes a certain way, they cannot go against it. ColinC Jan 2024 #94
They can change the law for the next election but not a past election. whopis01 Jan 2024 #105
Oooo ColinC Jan 2024 #35
If we don't do something like this montanacowboy Jan 2024 #41
It's good to get the ideas out there aka messaging. chowder66 Jan 2024 #46
All 3 have needed to be done for a long time Bayard Jan 2024 #49
Jim Crowe hold over needs to be in the history books, like the Confederate Flag. Bluethroughu Jan 2024 #51
" getting rid of the Electoral College, expanding the Supreme Court and eliminating the filibuster." Talitha Jan 2024 #52
Not having a filibuster Mountainguy Jan 2024 #54
Always a good idea when you're in the majority. Always a bad idea when you're in the minority. SlimJimmy Jan 2024 #63
K&R Blue Owl Jan 2024 #55
He can work to abolish the filibuster. He hasn't a chance of eliminating the Electoral College. brooklynite Jan 2024 #58
Prediction if the worst comes to pass FBaggins Jan 2024 #96
Voting to abolish the filibuster is a thing that can be done Bettie Jan 2024 #65
Love this candidate! ananda Jan 2024 #68
If Republicans take the Senate in 2024 former9thward Jan 2024 #70
Agree 100%. n/t Paper Roses Jan 2024 #72
Sounds good to me, I'm for it. Long past do. republianmushroom Jan 2024 #75
Hell Yes, his proposals are a great start. Magoo48 Jan 2024 #83
I don't agree with abolishing the filibuster, but it should be limited bucolic_frolic Jan 2024 #85
100%. I'm also a Katie Porter fan. mahina Jan 2024 #88
Unfortunately, some of his proposals aren't feasible short of changing the Constitution. LudwigPastorius Jan 2024 #90
Unfortunately BannonsLiver Jan 2024 #95
The Electoral College is a joke. sellitman Jan 2024 #97
His agenda is mine. jaxexpat Jan 2024 #99
The Court and Filibuster are doable quickly with a majority in congress. I believe it takes a Constitutional Amendment Rafi Jan 2024 #101
He is a gem. I will be donating to his campaign bc they have gone after him FlyingPiggy Jan 2024 #111
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Schiff would abolish fili...»Reply #62