General Discussion

TSExile

(3,363 posts)

3. Wonderful.

Tue Jan 16, 2024, 01:36 PM

Jan 2024

I am at work and can't see any news coverage. Is the gigantic ogre actually in the courtroom right now? Is E. Jean there?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

iluvtennis

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

E. Jean Carroll case: Two potential jurors say they believed the 2020 presidential election was stolen [View all] iluvtennis Jan 2024 OP

Trump will be signing them up to his fundraising list Walleye Jan 2024 #1

Selling them a piece of his pant leg. gab13by13 Jan 2024 #4

A one inch square piece Walleye Jan 2024 #9

The part of the pants where he shat meow2u3 Jan 2024 #45

With stupid that extensive ExWhoDoesntCare Jan 2024 #31

That might be a good question to ask prospective jurors Walleye Jan 2024 #34

Please Please Trump, gab13by13 Jan 2024 #2

Wonderful. TSExile Jan 2024 #3

Yes Yes gab13by13 Jan 2024 #5

He was there earlier. See the summary UPDATE at this link... iluvtennis Jan 2024 #6

Thank you both kindly. TSExile Jan 2024 #8

Yea, and could just read TFG's mind, (oh don't tell the judge that) bluestarone Jan 2024 #7

its not the ones who answer truthfully I worry about.... getagrip_already Jan 2024 #10

They should be able to check their voting history and check social media. LiberalFighter Jan 2024 #17

the jury is anonymous. mopinko Jan 2024 #24

What would "voting history" tell them... Thunderbeast Jan 2024 #41

Keep the maga MOMFUDSKI Jan 2024 #11

How many lied? spanone Jan 2024 #12

My first thought too. no_hypocrisy Jan 2024 #13

If they go to prison for him, what's s lie? spanone Jan 2024 #14

they're anonymous. mopinko Jan 2024 #25

I can assure you that attorneys have far more means ExWhoDoesntCare Jan 2024 #32

They could lie their way onto a jury. Nothing to stop that. spanone Jan 2024 #35

-Potential- Doesn't mean they're going to get chosen to be on the jury. Liberal In Texas Jan 2024 #15

And they may be able to strike them for cause Bettie Jan 2024 #21

Yes. Good point. Liberal In Texas Jan 2024 #22

two of them. barbtries Jan 2024 #16

ok jcgoldie Jan 2024 #18

Or they just really don't want to serve on the jury. Freethinker65 Jan 2024 #19

What I came to post. intheflow Jan 2024 #42

I have sat for jury selection where a batch of people were simply dismissed at the end... Hekate Jan 2024 #20

I'm a retired software engineer. I was always told that neither prosecutors nor defense attorneys iluvtennis Jan 2024 #23

I've heard something slightly different mchill Jan 2024 #27

Thanks for sharing that. Agree, the lawyers never tedn to want any jurors with subject matter expertise iluvtennis Jan 2024 #28

Heh. It might be fun to be on a jury together. I did get on one where a tenant was injured by a badly installed stove Hekate Jan 2024 #39

Wow, what a case. And it warms my heart you all found for the tenant. iluvtennis Jan 2024 #40

All of the election deniers have no evidence dlk Jan 2024 #26

aren't they vetted ? ShepKat Jan 2024 #29

They could be people wanting out of jury duty because Emile Jan 2024 #30

😆 JudyM Jan 2024 #43

They were NOT selected for the jury FelineOverlord Jan 2024 #33

If they believe the Big Lie, they will believe anything he says Walleye Jan 2024 #36

Without a shred of proof, the Big Lie is the gift that keeps on grifting (or giving). Goebells would be so proud. Evolve Dammit Jan 2024 #37

This jury will only decide how much money Trump will have to pay Carroll in damages. sop Jan 2024 #38

Nice that the judge was the one who asked the question. JudyM Jan 2024 #44

Yes. Heard on news this morning, that neither of the 2 potential jurors who said 2020 election iluvtennis Jan 2024 #46

He is now trying to think of a way to communicate to magats that they should cloak themselves JudyM Jan 2024 #47