General Discussion

Evolve Dammit

(21,779 posts)

37. Without a shred of proof, the Big Lie is the gift that keeps on grifting (or giving). Goebells would be so proud.

Reply to iluvtennis (Original post)

Tue Jan 16, 2024, 04:14 PM

Jan 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Boomerproud

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

E. Jean Carroll case: Two potential jurors say they believed the 2020 presidential election was stolen [View all] iluvtennis Jan 2024 OP

Trump will be signing them up to his fundraising list Walleye Jan 2024 #1

Selling them a piece of his pant leg. gab13by13 Jan 2024 #4

A one inch square piece Walleye Jan 2024 #9

The part of the pants where he shat meow2u3 Jan 2024 #45

With stupid that extensive ExWhoDoesntCare Jan 2024 #31

That might be a good question to ask prospective jurors Walleye Jan 2024 #34

Please Please Trump, gab13by13 Jan 2024 #2

Wonderful. TSExile Jan 2024 #3

Yes Yes gab13by13 Jan 2024 #5

He was there earlier. See the summary UPDATE at this link... iluvtennis Jan 2024 #6

Thank you both kindly. TSExile Jan 2024 #8

Yea, and could just read TFG's mind, (oh don't tell the judge that) bluestarone Jan 2024 #7

its not the ones who answer truthfully I worry about.... getagrip_already Jan 2024 #10

They should be able to check their voting history and check social media. LiberalFighter Jan 2024 #17

the jury is anonymous. mopinko Jan 2024 #24

What would "voting history" tell them... Thunderbeast Jan 2024 #41

Keep the maga MOMFUDSKI Jan 2024 #11

How many lied? spanone Jan 2024 #12

My first thought too. no_hypocrisy Jan 2024 #13

If they go to prison for him, what's s lie? spanone Jan 2024 #14

they're anonymous. mopinko Jan 2024 #25

I can assure you that attorneys have far more means ExWhoDoesntCare Jan 2024 #32

They could lie their way onto a jury. Nothing to stop that. spanone Jan 2024 #35

-Potential- Doesn't mean they're going to get chosen to be on the jury. Liberal In Texas Jan 2024 #15

And they may be able to strike them for cause Bettie Jan 2024 #21

Yes. Good point. Liberal In Texas Jan 2024 #22

two of them. barbtries Jan 2024 #16

ok jcgoldie Jan 2024 #18

Or they just really don't want to serve on the jury. Freethinker65 Jan 2024 #19

What I came to post. intheflow Jan 2024 #42

I have sat for jury selection where a batch of people were simply dismissed at the end... Hekate Jan 2024 #20

I'm a retired software engineer. I was always told that neither prosecutors nor defense attorneys iluvtennis Jan 2024 #23

I've heard something slightly different mchill Jan 2024 #27

Thanks for sharing that. Agree, the lawyers never tedn to want any jurors with subject matter expertise iluvtennis Jan 2024 #28

Heh. It might be fun to be on a jury together. I did get on one where a tenant was injured by a badly installed stove Hekate Jan 2024 #39

Wow, what a case. And it warms my heart you all found for the tenant. iluvtennis Jan 2024 #40

All of the election deniers have no evidence dlk Jan 2024 #26

aren't they vetted ? ShepKat Jan 2024 #29

They could be people wanting out of jury duty because Emile Jan 2024 #30

😆 JudyM Jan 2024 #43

They were NOT selected for the jury FelineOverlord Jan 2024 #33

If they believe the Big Lie, they will believe anything he says Walleye Jan 2024 #36

Without a shred of proof, the Big Lie is the gift that keeps on grifting (or giving). Goebells would be so proud. Evolve Dammit Jan 2024 #37

This jury will only decide how much money Trump will have to pay Carroll in damages. sop Jan 2024 #38

Nice that the judge was the one who asked the question. JudyM Jan 2024 #44

Yes. Heard on news this morning, that neither of the 2 potential jurors who said 2020 election iluvtennis Jan 2024 #46

He is now trying to think of a way to communicate to magats that they should cloak themselves JudyM Jan 2024 #47