Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

noise

(2,392 posts)
31. If the "war on terror" is as serious as a bunch of fearmongering politicians claim it to be
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 08:36 PM
Dec 2011

then why on earth do they pretend Iraq was a "good faith diversion?" If they truly believed their fearmongering claims they would not pretend that the Iraq invasion/occupation was anything but an outrage which severely compromised the war on terror.

You are right. Anyone paying attention should be extremely concerned.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No veto??? Well this is a surprise. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #1
Not surprising... TDale313 Dec 2011 #5
agree... unfortunately. Justice wanted Dec 2011 #8
Further in the article suffragette Dec 2011 #2
No a bit surprised on that, Autumn Dec 2011 #3
Even when Obama wins a staredown, he just can't win with some people. TheWraith Dec 2011 #4
The legislation also would deny... Richard Charnin Dec 2011 #6
the issue is the content of the bill not Obama's political gamesmanship nt msongs Dec 2011 #11
From the article... markpkessinger Dec 2011 #12
Your point is THE point. stillwaiting Dec 2011 #14
That's my problem with it, too Aerows Dec 2011 #17
The House hasn't voted yet on this proposed legislation AtomicKitten Dec 2011 #7
Well said AC! nt One of the 99 Dec 2011 #9
Hello there. Welcome to DU. AtomicKitten Dec 2011 #29
When we are even THINKING Aerows Dec 2011 #23
No flies on you. Why wait for the facts? AtomicKitten Dec 2011 #24
I'm going to be alarmed Aerows Dec 2011 #25
Again you are jumping the gun, but have at. AtomicKitten Dec 2011 #26
It's not jumping the gun whatsoever Aerows Dec 2011 #27
Don't project your hypervigilence on me. AtomicKitten Dec 2011 #28
I'll continue to be vigilent Aerows Dec 2011 #30
If the "war on terror" is as serious as a bunch of fearmongering politicians claim it to be noise Dec 2011 #31
Sections 1031 and 1032 explicitly exclude American citizens and Green Card holders. AtomicKitten Dec 2011 #40
No, what it says is... Aerows Dec 2011 #41
The Constitution still stands regardless, but these statutes AtomicKitten Dec 2011 #42
The AP reported this today. Aerows Dec 2011 #43
Read it again. It reflects the exemptions I already posted. AtomicKitten Dec 2011 #45
I think you've rather lost the plot. Robb Dec 2011 #10
Thanks. (nt) redqueen Dec 2011 #13
It gives the president discretion Aerows Dec 2011 #15
The bill he threatened to veto said zero civilian trials. Robb Dec 2011 #16
Should he sign THIS one? n/t brentspeak Dec 2011 #18
Hence now we have elected kings nadinbrzezinski Dec 2011 #20
How dare you! noise Dec 2011 #32
This is no improvement Aerows Dec 2011 #21
See the US. and one Mr. Padilla nadinbrzezinski Dec 2011 #34
No. It does not give that power. Robb Dec 2011 #35
From the AP article Aerows Dec 2011 #39
"The provisions do not extend new authority to detain U.S. citizens." Robb Dec 2011 #46
So you trust a future Repub president with this power? nt Union Scribe Dec 2011 #33
If President Obama is willing to do so, shouldn't that be good enough for us? AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #47
I want to watch what Rep.Barbra Lee said about it Autumn Dec 2011 #19
Correction Aerows Dec 2011 #22
Bring back unrec! Bring back unrec! Number23 Dec 2011 #36
Totally noise Dec 2011 #37
WTF Obama- hope my ass Dragonbreathp9d Dec 2011 #38
Incredible.... rasputin1952 Dec 2011 #44
If you think American is still a free country urantia1 Dec 2011 #48
White House says NO to wanting my vote slay Dec 2011 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House Says No Veto ...»Reply #31