Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:07 AM Nov 2012

Strange: Why Do Red States Have More Traffic Fatalities? [View all]

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/strange-why-do-red-states-have-more-traffic-fatalities


Strange: Why Do Red States Have More Traffic Fatalities?
November 20, 2012 |

When it comes to politics, conservative and liberal states are certainly on completely different tracks. But surprisingly, research shows they also part ways on a gloomy statistic: fatal traffic accidents.

Stuart Silverstein, a reporter for FairWarning, a nonprofit investigative news organization focused on public health and safety issues , reported Tuesday that traffic fatalities are more likely to occur in red states than blue states. Looking at 2010 federal statistics, Silverstein found that states with the highest rates of traffic deaths were overwhelmingly red states — calculated by those which voted Romney in the 2012 election. It’s estimated that U.S. traffic accidents killed more than 32,000 people in 2010.

Wyoming had the highest rate of deaths per 100,000 people at 27.46, while the District of Columbia had the lowest rate of deaths at 3.97. Although there are some outliers, Silverstein’s graph shows a clear partisan divide when it comes to traffic fatalities — which have safety experts perplexed.

Below is the chart:

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More traveling on poor farm to market roads? Are_grits_groceries Nov 2012 #1
Red states have to use cars more. Fawke Em Nov 2012 #2
California has heavy car usage and a very low fatality rate. trotsky Nov 2012 #17
That's because we're all in traffic, moving 10 mph. Marr Nov 2012 #27
You joke but I think that is part of the issue. Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2012 #38
Partly true, in my experience. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #39
So are we subsidizing their auto insurance claims in addition to all the federal money they suck? randr Nov 2012 #3
No. You are supporting fellow Americans. Fawke Em Nov 2012 #6
Sad how they hate us, isn't it? cordelia Nov 2012 #29
I do recognize your efforts Fawke Em randr Nov 2012 #43
Insurance rates already are higher or lower depending upon where you live. PA Democrat Nov 2012 #44
Wonder how seat belt usage factors in? n/t Cairycat Nov 2012 #4
Seat belts are just another form of big brother BlueStreak Nov 2012 #28
I can tell you this, about my corner of Alabama. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #40
UPdate to my earlier reply. add 2 more dead to Ala. score. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #58
stinking driving laws aren't for Republicans 2pooped2pop Nov 2012 #5
Most of those Aerows Nov 2012 #7
"Red states" are generally less populated than Blue states MiniMe Nov 2012 #8
Without knowing miles driven, it's an utterly useless statistic. Robb Nov 2012 #9
+1 good point KurtNYC Nov 2012 #22
You win the thread - I was thinking the same GoneOffShore Nov 2012 #26
People in Red states rely on "faith based lane changes"? n/t Nevilledog Nov 2012 #10
More rural, poorer condition roads and vehicles, more impaired drivers. Hard to maintain control leveymg Nov 2012 #11
I'll agree with poorer condition roads and vehicles Aerows Nov 2012 #12
More cars, hence.. ananda Nov 2012 #13
Florida, Texas and California Aerows Nov 2012 #14
More shitty beer. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #15
Public Transportation in Large Cities Macoy51 Nov 2012 #16
"Riding on the Metro" - Berlin, circa 1982, "Pleasure Victim" album. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #18
Great Song, Sir The Magistrate Nov 2012 #46
Then there's the extended version of "SEX" (only on the CD, not vinyl) HopeHoops Nov 2012 #56
Thread title is misleading. Go Vols Nov 2012 #19
Those three states Aerows Nov 2012 #20
I would agree 100%. Go Vols Nov 2012 #21
If I were to guess. aandegoons Nov 2012 #23
Perhaps a dearth of EMTs due to budget cuts. Doremus Nov 2012 #24
I can think of a couple of reasons Glitterati Nov 2012 #25
Did you read to the end of the article? GoneOffShore Nov 2012 #30
Simple oswaldactedalone Nov 2012 #31
Two-lane non-divided highways with speeds of 60+ and TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #32
THIS... It would happen all the same in rural blue areas, if they existed. nt Thegonagle Nov 2012 #47
Just speaking for WV, we have the highest cost per mile of road and worst roads in the nation 1-Old-Man Nov 2012 #33
The standard one-mile rural/agricultural grid IDemo Nov 2012 #34
Texas just went up to 85 MPH on a stretch of highway... w8liftinglady Nov 2012 #35
Easy answer: LiberalEsto Nov 2012 #36
I was going to say "dumb rednecks drive like dumb rednecks" demhottie Nov 2012 #51
Speeding drunk at night on 2-lane highways and roads. FarCenter Nov 2012 #37
Substance abuse--especially booze and meth? Poorly maintained cars and rattle-trap clunkers? Surya Gayatri Nov 2012 #41
Because good ole boys billh58 Nov 2012 #42
Low population density, rural, no public transportation = more miles driven TransitJohn Nov 2012 #45
++ Also, most of those miles are at highway speeds, typically on shoulderless two-lane roads. Thegonagle Nov 2012 #48
This. nt redqueen Nov 2012 #49
speed kills. BlueMan Votes Nov 2012 #50
Speed limit too high? Too many potholes on roads maintained by the state? Cleita Nov 2012 #52
They also have higher rates of teen pregnancy, Doctor_J Nov 2012 #53
Less Likely to support Govt Laws to Control things like Speed Limit JI7 Nov 2012 #54
Speed? Renew Deal Nov 2012 #55
Anyone who has seen... liberalmuse Nov 2012 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Strange: Why Do Red State...